15.04.03. Ukraine
arbejder på at blive medlem af WTO før Rusland
15.04.03. Commemorating
1943 events in Volyn
15.04.03. Ukraine cracks
down on media
15.04.03. Interview
med den nu afdøde journalist Oleksandr Kryvenko
14.04.03. "Vores
Ukraine" er imod to-kammer parlament
14.04.03. Azarov:
USA har hævet de finansielle sanktioner mod Ukraine
14.04.03. Befolkningen
deltager ikke i debatten om Kutjmas politiske reformer
11.04.03. Indenrigsministeriet
udelukker politiske motiver i forbindelse med journalists død
11.04.03. Kutjma
mener, at irakerne selv skal afgøre det irakiske folks skæbne
11.04.03. Løbesedler
fra pseudo-Jusjtjenko: amerikanske landmænd skal lære
"dovne ukrainere" at arbejde
11.04.03. Ukraines
premierminister: Tyskland er interesseret i olierørledningen "Odesa-Brody"
10.04.03. Jusjtjenko
imod at forlænge Kutjmas embedsperiode
10.04.03. Politiet
afviser teori om mord på journalist
10.04.03. Moscow
reluctant to finalize border agreements with former Soviet republics
10.04.03. Kendt
ukrainsk journalist omkommer i bilulykke
09.04.03. Kutjma
på besøg i Centralasien
09.04.03. Ukrainsk
journalist omkommet under beskydning af hotel i Bagdad
09.04.03. Ukraine
vil invitere irakiske børn på rekreation
09.04.03. 100,000-150,000
Ukrainians working illegally in Poland
09.04.03. Anklagemyndigheden
vil rejse sager оm bagvaskelse af præsidenten
08.04.03. Folkeafstemning
hvis parlamentet ikke går med til Kutjmas reformer?
08.04.03. Jo større
uenigheden er mellem USA og Rusland, des bedre er det for det ukrainske styre
07.04.03. Ukrainian sex
slaves
07.04.03. Verdensbanken
opfordrer Ukraine til at arbejde på WTO-medlemskab
07.04.03. NATO
membership for Ukraine not likely before 2012
04.04.03. Jusjtjenko
vil ikke udelukke, at Kutjmas administration vil gribe til folkeafstemning
04.04.03. "Koltjuga"-spørgsmålet
kan blive løst efter krigen
04.04.03. Europarådet
vil se nærmere på Kutjmas forfatningsændringer
03.04.03. Undervisningsminister
pålægger lektorer at agitere for Kutjmas reformer?
03.04.03. Anklagemyndigheden
har lukket sagen om Kolomijets' død
03.04.03. Will
political reform lead Ukraine out of crisis?
03.04.03. Financial
Times: Washington brings Ukraine into coalition
02.04.04. Ukraine
afviser at have solgt antitank-missiler til Irak
02.04.03. Amerikanerne
fremlægger dokumentation for Ukraines deltagelse i koalitionen
mod Irak
01.04.03. 78%
af ukrainerne går ind for at begrænse antallet
af parlamentsmedlemmer
01.04.03. Ukrainsk
våbeneksport halveret efter "Koltjuga"-sagen
01.04.03.
Ukraine
har mistet 170 mill. $ p.a. Irak-krisen
01.04.03. Ukraine har
mistet 170 mill. $ p.a. Irak-krisen
Ukraines økonomiministerium vurderer,
at Ukraines tab i løbet af 2002 som følge af
den forventede krig mod Irak beløber sig til omtrent 170,4
mill. $, hvilket svarer til faldet i eksporten af ukrainske varer
til landet i sammenligning med 2001, oplyser Interfaks-Ukrajina.
Eksperter forventer yderligere tab for ukrainsk økonomi i 2003
i forbindelse med krigen i Irak.
Ministeriets specialister
bemærker, at krigen i Irak kan føre til en stigning
i oliepriserne i Europa p.a. mangel på olie, Ruslands
overførsel af sin olieeksport fra det ukrainske marked
til det europæiske marked, hvilket kan føre til et fald
i olieforarbejdningen og en stigning i omkostningerne.
En stigning i prisen
på olieprodukter kan føre til en stigning i omkostningerne
ved anden industriproduktion og, når man medregner
en begrænset størrelse af den købekraftige
del af den hjemlige efterspørgsel, vil det føre
til et fald i produktionen.
Økonomiministeriet
mener, at hvis oliepriserne stiger, så vil verdensøkonomien
blive bremset 1-1,2% og, at det deraf følgende fald i
verdensmarkedets efterspørgsel vil føre til, at
Ukraine mister 800-850 mill. $ om året.
"Alene i samhandlen
med Irak vil Ukraine miste 300 mill. $", - hedder det i økonomiministeriets
materialer.
Desuden oplyser ministeriet
om de indirekte tab som følge af en begrænsning
af omfanget af samarbejdet, såfremt krigen trækker
ud, med Iraks nabolande: Tyrkiet (fremhævet som strategisk
hovedpartner), Saudi-Arabien, Syrien, Iran, Jordan og Kuwait.
Ifølge økonomiministeriet
udgjorde Ukraines samlede handel med disse lande i 2002 næsten
2,2 mia. $, herunder udgjorde eksporten 1,9 mill. $, hvilket
svarede til henholdsvis 6,4% og 10,3% i landets samlede udenrigshandel.
Ministeriet bemærker,
at udsvingene i dollarkursen p.a. krigen i Irak reelt ikke
vil have nogen betydning for Ukraines valutamarked og fondsmarked.
"Her giver vores økonomis svage integration i verdensøkonomien
en positiv effekt", - forklarer økonomiministeriet.
Samtidig vil ministeriet
ikke udelukke, at svækkelsen af dollaren på verdens
valutamarkeder vil føre til en mindre nominel devaluering
af hryvnaen i forhold til dollaren. Korrespondent.net.
01.04.03. Ukrainsk
våbeneksport halveret efter "Koltjuga"-sagen
I løbet af det seneste år
er der sket næsten en halvering i det statslige selskab
"Ukrspetseksport"s kontrakter om eksport af våben og militære
teknologier - fra 54 stk. i anden kvartal af 2002 til 28 stk. i
første kvartal af 2003, oplyste generaldirektør for "Ukrspetseksport",
Valerij Shmarov, til et erhvervsprogram på Ukraines Tv-1
(UT-1).
Han påpegede,
at de politiske grunde, herunder skandalen omkring den påståede
eksport af de ukrainske radarsystemer "Koltjuga" til Irak,
har haft en indflydelse på faldet i våbeneksporten.
Shmarov understregede i den forbindelse, at undersøgelsen
havde vist, at Ukraine ikke havde leveret disse anlæg til
Irak.
Samtidig med det sagde
Shmarov, at det lykkedes selskabet i slutningen af sidste år
at undertegne en række aftaler om levering af disse systemer
for passiv radarovervågning. Han ville dog ikke oplyse,
hvilke lande kontrakterne var blevet underskrevet med.
Ifølge generaldirektøren
for "Ukrspetseksport" indgik selskabet i 3. kvartal af 2002
aftaler om våbenleverancer og leverancer af militærteknologi
og ydelser, og i 4. kvartal af 2002 underskrev man 36 sådanne
kontrakter.
I 2000 udgjorde eksporten
af forsvarsministeriets og andre militære formationers
ejendom 65% af Ukraines samlede eksport af våben, teknologier
og ydelser, 19% udgjordes af eksporten af produktion og ydelser
fra virksomheder i det militær-industrielle kompleks og
andre institutioner, mens 16% udgjordes af eksport af forsvarsministeriets
produkter og ydelser. I 2001 var disse tal henholdsvis 35%, 41%
og 24%, og de i 2002: henholdsvis 18%, 60% og 22%.
Ifølge Center
for studier af hæren, produktionsomlægning og afvæbning
faldt Ukraines våbeneksport sidste år med 100 mill.
$ til 450 mill. $. Interfaks-Ukrajina. UP.
01.04.03. 78% af ukrainerne
går ind for at begrænse antallet af parlamentsmedlemmer
19% af ukrainerne går ind for at begrænse
præsidentens beføjelser i overensstemmelse med
præsident Leonid Kutjmas forslag, mens henved 25% mener,
at "man bør indføre yderligere begrænsninger
(udover dem, som præsidenten har foreslået). Ca.
15% mener, at man slet ikke bør begrænse den ukrainske
præsidents beføjelser.
Det er resultatet af
en meningsmåling under navnet "Dialog-8", som er blevet
gennemført i dagene 20-24 marts af Centret for politiske
og sociale studier SOCIS sammen med Kyivs center for politiske
studier og konfliktologi (direktør Mykhajlo Pohrebynskyj).
2000 personer deltog i undersøgelsen, og fejlmargenen udgør
højst 2,3%.
Op mod 40% af de adspurgte
kunne ikke svare på spørgsmålet: "Hvad
mener De om de af Kutjma foreslåede begrænsninger
af Ukraines præsidents beføjelser?"
78% af Ukraines borgere
støtter Kutjmas forslag indenfor rammerne af den politiske
reform om begrænsningen af antallet af folkedeputerede.
Over halvdelen (53%) har ikke noget imod, at en folkeafstemning
skal have direkte lovkraft. 59% af de adspurgte støtter præsidentens
forslag om, at parlamentet og ikke præsidenten skal udnævne
premierministeren og flertallet af regeringen. 14% er imod dette forslag.
Forslaget "om yderligere
adgang for præsidenten til at opløse parlamentet,
såfremt det er uarbejdsdygtigt" støttes af 50%
af forslagsstillerne, mens 18% er imod.
Ukrainerne er splittede
i holdningen til Kutjmas forslag om, at præsidentens
skal udnævne de såkaldte magtministre (33% går
ind for forslaget; mens 36% er imod). 35% går ind for forslaget
om et tokammer parlament, mens 26% er imod. Hele 39% kunne imidlertid
ikke tilkendegive deres holdning til spørgsmålet
om et tokammer parlament. Interfaks-Ukrajina. UP.
02.04.03. Amerikanerne
fremlægger dokumentation for Ukraines deltagelse i koalitionen
mod Irak
"Amerikas forenede Stater er ikke interesseret
i at presse et land med henblik på at inkludere det i
koalitionen til afvæbningen af Irak. Det er landets eget
valg. Hvis Ukraine mener, at der har fundet en misforståelse
sted, så burde udenrigsministeriet i det tilfælde have
informeret USAs ambassade i Kiev, eller også burde Ukraines
ambassade i Washington have informeret USAs udenrigsministerium".
Således kommenterede
USAs ambassadens pressetjeneste i går de ukrainske politikeres
afvisning af Ukraines deltagelse i den antiirakiske koalition.
Tirsdag havde lederen af udenrigsministeriets pressetjeneste,
Markian Lubkyvskyj, endnu en gang sagt, at Ukraine ikke havde anmodet
det officielle Washington om at medregne landet til koalitionen.
Den amerikanske ambassades
pressetjeneste oplyser, at USAs ambassade den 25. marts, dagen
inden præsident Bush's tale (hvor han for første
gang i en offentlig sammenhæng omtalte Ukraine, red.),
rettede en forespørgsel til Ukraines ambassade i Washington
og præsidentens administration i Kiev om "hvorvidt Ukraine
ville have noget imod at blive omtalt i præsident Bush's tale
som medlem af den koalition af lande, der går ind for en
afvæbning af Irak".
"Vi lod dem klart forstå,
at præsident Bush ville betegne Ukraine som en del af
koalitionen, og netop derfor rettede vi forespørgslen.
Både Ukraines ambassade i Washington og præsidentens
administration i Kiev bekræftede, at præsident Bush
gerne måtte omtale Ukraine som en del af koalitionen. Ukraine
bad os desuden om, at vi fremhævede, at bataljonen var sendt
for at forsvare og ikke var en del af den væbnede konflikt",
hedder det i meddelelsen fra USAs ambassades pressetjeneste.
Efter offentliggørelsen
af præsident Bush's tale "fik ambassaden at vide" under
et møde i præsidentens administration og i udenrigsministeriet,
at "Ukraine var tilfreds med at blive omtalt i præsident
Bush's tale, og bekræftede endnu en gang, at staten betragtede
sig selv som en del af koalitionen".
Desuden oplyser ambassadens
pressetjeneste, at repræsentanter for USAs diplomatiske
repræsentation havde holdt møder i præsidentens
administration, i Det nationale sikkerheds-og forsvarsråd,
udenrigsministeriet samt med repræsentanter for den ukrainske
regering med henblik på at afklare mulighederne for koalitionsmedlemmernes
deltagelse i tenderne over underentrepriser.
"Grundlaget for vores
møder var klart. Ikke en eneste af de ukrainske repræsentater
afviste ikke en eneste gang, at Ukraine er en del af koalitionen",
erklærer USAs ambassades pressetjeneste. UP.
Præsidentens repræsentant
i parlamentet, Oleksandr Zadorozhnij, havde samme dag udtalt,
at Ukraines officielle holdning i forhold til situationen omkring
Irak var udtrykt af det ukrainske parlament og vedrører
ABC-bataljonens deltagelse i en humanitær mission.
Han understregede overfor
Interfaks-Ukraijna, at der var en juridisk nuance; nemlig
forskellen mellem "at betragte" og "at være".
"Det er forskellige ting,
- sagde Zadorozhnij. - Erklæringer fra forskellige staters
officielle personer, herunder USA, om at vi bliver betragtet
som medlemmer af den anti-irakiske koalition, betyder ikke, at vi
er medlemmer af den anti-irakiske koalition".
02.04.04. Ukraine afviser
at have solgt antitank-missiler til Irak
Ukraine producerer ikke nogen antitank-missiler
herunder raketterne af typen "Kornet-E", og desuden er det
ikke en del af de ukrainske væbnede styrkers arsenal. Det
sagde ifølge Interfaks-Ukraijna en kilde i Komiteen
for det militær-teknologiske samarbejdes politik og eksportkontrol
ved Ukraines præsident.
Erlæringen blev givet
i forlængelse af en artikel i det amerikanske ugeblad
Newsweek om, at Bagdad i januar i år skulle have modtaget
omkring 500 "Kornet-E" raketter via ukrainske våbenhandlere.
Repræsentanten for
komiteen understregede, at Ukraine "til punkt og prikke overholder
FNs sanktioner i forhold til et forbud mod at levere våben
og våbenteknologi til Irak".
I den forbindelse betegnede
kilden beskyldningerne mod ukrainske selskaber for at have
leveret antitank-missilet "Kornet-E" til Irak som værende
grundløse.
USA har udtrykt bekymring
for, at de irakiske styrker var fundet i besiddelse af de nyeste
antitank-missilier "Kornet" af russiske produktion, ved hjælp
af hvilke de allerede har ødelagt to af de tunge "Abrams"
kampvogne.
Man har fra russisk side
ligeledes afvist påstandene om en medvirken til leveringen
af disse raketter. Korrespondent.net.
03.04.03. Financial
Times: Washington brings Ukraine into coalition
By Tom Warner in Kiev
FT.com site; Apr 01, 2003
Only six months after the US accused Leonid
Kuchma, Ukraine's president, of approving the sale of high-tech
radar systems to Iraq, Ukraine has joined the US-led coalition
fighting to overthrow Saddam Hussein's regime.
Although Ukraine says it opposes the military
effort and is sending only "humanitarian aid", the US is hailing
Ukraine's membership as a significant step towards mending relations.
The inclusion of an avowedly pacifist, allegedly
embargo-busting country in the coalition shows how eager the
US is to portray broad international support for the military
campaign. A recent White House press release lists 48 coalition
members, ranging from active combat participants to countries with
less clear roles, such as Mongolia and Tonga.
Markian Lubkivsky, press service chief at Ukraine's
foreign ministry, said his country's sole contribution was a
hazardous chemicals clean-up unit stationed in Kuwait, which he
said had a "humanitarian" mission and would not enter Iraq.
"We can be regarded as a participant in the
coalition only in that [humanitarian] sense," he said at a press
conference on Tuesday.
"Ukraine is exclusively for deciding any crisis
situation by peaceful means."
But US ambassador Carlos Pascual said his government
regarded Ukraine as a backer of the war.
He said: "In saying that they are ready to
be considered as part of the coalition to disarm Iraq, we take
that as support for our position."
The most immediate benefit of membership is
that Ukrainian companies can apply for work as subcontractors
to the US firms that will lead the initial phase of Iraq's postwar
reconstruction. Mr Pascual said Ukraine had many "competitive" companies,
such as the steel pipe producers already involved in the UN's oil-for-food
program.
The US still suspects that a plan to smuggle
Ukrainian radars into Iraq, allegedly approved by Mr Kuchma
in a secretly recorded meeting in 2000, may have been carried out.
At Tuesday's briefing, Mr Lubkivsky denied
a fresh report in this week's Newsweek that Ukrainian arms dealers
had recently delivered anti-tank weapons to Iraq, in violation
of the United Nations arms embargo.
In spite of their differences, Mr Pascual said
the US and Ukraine were learning to work together on specific
issues.
"I think that more and more Ukrainian figures,
both in and out of government, are recognising that isolation
is not a good option and that extreme dependence on Russia is
not in their interests. And both of those is where they were
headed," he said.
Ukraine had been steadily ramping up its relations
with Iraq over the past few years. It opened an embassy in Baghdad
and an Iraqi embassy was opened in Kiev. There were also plans
for a trade mission in Baghdad.
03.04.03. Will political
reform lead Ukraine out of crisis?
Johnson's Russia List, #7110
RFE/RL Newsline,
March 19, 2003
By Taras Kuzio
Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma submitted
draft political reforms to the Verkhovna Rada on 6 March, but
those proposals are unlikely to overcome Ukraine's profound political
crisis.
The need for change was highlighted by the
findings of an opinion poll reported by "Ukrayinska pravda"
on 11 March, according to which 45 percent of respondents backed
radical change, 38 percent supported revolutionary reform, and
11 percent backed revolutionary changes. Only 6 percent believed
changes were unnecessary.
That level of discontent notwithstanding, the
authorities are continuing to put on a brave face on things.
Looking to next year's presidential elections, presidential administration
head Viktor Medvedchuk is convinced that "the authorities firmly
believe in their victory in the future political battles." Such
optimism is largely unfounded. Kuchma's popularity is at an all-time
low, hovering at 5-8 percent. In contrast, the presidents of Russia,
Moldova, and Belarus enjoy popularity ratings of 72, 67, and 27 percent,
respectively. A November-December poll by Democratic Initiatives Fund
found that 55 percent of Ukrainians distrust Kuchma, while three-quarters
would like to see him step down early.
The political crisis has its roots in the delegitimization
of Ukraine's ruling class, the former Communist Party of Ukraine
elite who became "sovereign communists" in the late Soviet era
and "centrists" after Ukraine won its independence. This delegitimization
makes it impossible to arrange a transfer of power similar to
the one that occurred in Russia in 1999-2000, when Boris Yeltsin
passed the torch to Vladimir Putin. In that Kuchma is widely perceived
as "an extremely unpopular and incompetent leader," his endorsement
would prove "a heavy weight that could drown" any potential presidential
candidate, Razumkov Center President Anatoliy Hrytsenko wrote in the
weekly "Zerkalo Nedeli" of 8-14 March.
Pro-presidential leaders are unpopular because
of the public perception of the elites as corrupt, amoral, and
indifferent to the needs of the population. Not surprisingly,
therefore, a Razumkov Center poll found that 81.6 percent are opposed
to Kuchma standing for a third term, while a similar figure opposes
any potential attempt at granting him immunity from prosecution.
The front-runners from the first round of the
1994 presidential elections who went on to the second round were
Leonid Kravchuk (37.27 percent) and Kuchma (31.27 percent), while
Kuchma (36.49 percent) and Symonenko (22.24 percent) advanced in
the 1999 elections. In opinion surveys, pro-presidential figures
poll 5-8 percent, making it difficult to see how they could increase
this figure to the more than 20 percent needed to win a place in the
second round of the 2004 elections.
By contrast, opinion polls since 2000 have
consistently indicated that opposition Our Ukraine leader Viktor
Yushchenko wins ratings of 23-30 percent, with Communist leader
Piotr Symonenko in second place with 11-16 percent. Yushchenko is
also the only candidate with a consistently higher positive than
negative rating.
With such public support, Yushchenko would
be virtually guaranteed a place in the second round of 2004
elections, where he might face Symonenko, whom he would presumably
defeat (as Kuchma did in 1999). As Hrytsenko concluded, "If this
leadership carries on with its policies, it is doomed, and none
of its candidates will get as far as the second round." Medvedchuk's
claim in an interview in the newspaper "2000" that "the authorities
are now stronger than ever before" therefore rings hollow.
But despite the clear need for radical reform,
the changes that Kuchma has proposed as a means of defusing
the crisis are merely a reworking of those put to a referendum
in April 2000, the results of which were not recognized by either
the Council of Europe or the OSCE. In 2000, voters were asked to
approve or reject four proposals: a reduction in the size of parliament
from 450 to 300 deputies; the creation of an upper house comprising
regional representatives; the president power to dissolve parliament if
no majority is formed within a month or no budget is passed within
three months; and abolition of deputies' immunity from prosecution.
Kuchma's new proposals include the first three of the 2000 proposals,
but not the question of deputies' immunity.
In addition to reintroducing three of the four
2000 referendum questions, Kuchma has added fully proportional
elections to the lower house. In 1994 and 1998, 50 percent of
parliamentary deputies were elected in single-mandate constituencies,
while the other 50 percent won seats under a proportional (party-list)
system. In 2002, Kuchma opposed holding fully proportional elections,
but changed his mind after the elections were over. Under his most
recent proposals, elections to the lower house would be conducted
under a proportional system.
Kuchma's proposals for a fully proportional
election law were discussed in the Verkhovna Rada in February
but failed to win the required number of votes for approval. The
draft was backed by the ideologically driven left (Communists, Socialists)
and the right (Our Ukraine, Tymoshenko). Most of the pro-presidential
and ideologically amorphous "centrist" parties voted against the
draft -- the one exception being the Social Democratic Party united
(SDPUo), which is the only "centrist" party to have invested resources
in developing a nationwide party structure, as a result of which it
became the only "centrist" party to surmount the 4 percent threshold
in the proportional vote in the 2000 elections.
Under Kuchma's proposals, the upper House of
the Regions would include three representatives from each
of Ukraine's 24 oblasts, the Crimean autonomous republic, and
the two cities (Kyiv, Sevastopol) with all-union status, as well
as former presidents. This would allow Kuchma to become a senator
for two additional years after he leaves the president's office,
tiding him over until the next lower-house elections in 2006. When
similar proposals were discussed in the 1990s, eastern Ukrainian
elites rejected the creation of an upper house, saying it would give
the less populous and rural western Ukraine an equal standing with
the more populous east. As Kuchma opposes introducing elections for
regional governors' posts, the appointed upper house would act as a
pro-presidential body -- a counterweight to the lower house. (A similar
model is in place in Kazakhstan, Belarus, and Russia.)
The 2003 proposals thus reintroduce what Kuchma
wished to obtain in the 2000 referendum, when Yushchenko was prime
minister and there was a non-left majority comprising the "center"
and the center-right. This unity was irrevocably destroyed by
the so-called Kuchmagate crisis that began eight months later,
in November 2000. After the 2002 elections, Kuchma sought to create
a majority purely from the "center" to revive the 2000 reforms and
ensure his own immunity from prosecution. One factor in the aim
to transform Ukraine from a semi-presidential to a parliamentary-presidential
republic is ensuring that if elected, Yushchenko would not inherit
the extensive powers that Kuchma now wields.
Kuchma's reforms are to be the subject of Soviet-style
public discussion throughout the country. As in the Soviet
era, the authorities already claim that telegrams have been received
from workers' collectives in support of the proposals. But Ukrainian
journalists have pointed out that a free discussion is impossible
because the media (especially television) are controlled by the
state and oligarchs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taras Kuzio is a resident fellow at the Centre
for Russian and East European Studies, University of Toronto.
03.04.03. Anklagemyndigheden
har lukket sagen om Kolomijets' død
Anklagemyndigheden i Kyiv har afsluttet efterforskningen
i sagen om direktør for nyhedsbureauet Ukrajinski
Novyny Mykhajlo Kolomijets' død grundet fravær
af en kriminel handling, §6 pkt. 1 i Ukraines retsplejelov.
Vice-statsadvokat for Kyiv
by Ivan Derevjanko meddeler, at moderen til den omkomne journalist
allerede er gjort bekendt med beslutningen om at lukke sagen,
mens enken vil blive underrettet den 2. april.
Den officielle meddelelse
fra Kyiv bys statsadvokat vil blive offentliggjort den 2. april.
Fra den 21. oktober 2002
ophørte Kolomijets pludselig med at varetage den daglige
ledelse af nyhedsbureauet, og den 30. oktober blev Kolomijets'
lig fundet hængt i nærheden af Molodetjno i Hviderusland
og begravet som uidentificeret.
Efter ekshumeringen og identifikationen
af Kolomijets' lig blev det bragt til Kyiv og begravet.
Rigsadvokaturen rejste en
sigtelse efter parafgraffen "drevet til selvmord".
I februar 2003 etablerede
eksperterne Kolomijets' dødstidspunkt til at ligge
omkring den 28-29. oktober 2002. Den franske (Jean Rivole), den
hviderussiske (
Aleksandr Sosonovskij) og de ukrainske eksperter
nåede frem til den konklusion, at årsagen til journalistens
død var selvmord som følge af hængning.
Kyiv-anklagemyndighedens
pressetjeneste påpegede, at man ikke havde fundet nogen
data i forbindelse med en undersøgelse af Kolomijets'
lig, som kunne pege i retning af, at udefrakommende personer var
medvirkende til hans død. Podrobnosti.
03.04.03. Undervisningsminister
pålægger lektorer at agitere for Kutjmas reformer?
Onsdag indgik der til parlamentet en deputeret-forespørgsel
fra Mykola Tomenko, som påpeger det forfatningsstridige
i et dekret fra Ukraines undervisningsminister om oprettelsen af
lektor-grupper bestående af undervisere ved de videregående
læreanstalter, som skal forklare borgerne de forfatningsændringer,
som Ukraines præsident har foreslået.
Forespørgslen blev
bakket op af 160 deputerede og rettet til premierminister Viktor
Janukovytj.
"Over hele Ukraine - hedder
det i forespørgslen - opretter de regionale statsadministrationers
afdelinger for undervisning lektor-grupper bestående af
undervisere ved de højere læreanstalter, som skal
forklare befolkningen indholdet af de forfatningsændringer,
som Ukraines præsident har foreslået. Desuden oplyser massemedierne,
at underviserne ved de højere læreanstalter bliver
tvunget ind i disse lektor-grupper og det uden at få ekstra
betaling".
Den 21. marts 2003, citerer
pressetjenesten Tomenkos forespørgsel, blev der afholdt
et møde i Det nationale Jaroslav Mudryj juridiske akademi
for lektor-gruppen i Kharkiv-regionen.
Repræsentanter for
de regionale statsadministationers undervisningsafdelinger
forklarer oprettelsen af lektor-grupper med, at der er blevet
udstedt et dekret herom fra Ukraines undervisnings- og videnskabsministerium.
Mykola Tomenko fremhæver,
at et sådant dekret er en grov overtrædelse af Ukraines
forfatning, de grundliggende menneskerettigheder samt et bevis
på, at repræsentanter for den udøvende magt
ignorerer lovgivningens normer, og han kræver en omgående
undersøgelse af denne information og informere offentligheden
om resultatet af den.
Såfremt et sådant
dekret virkelig er blevet udstedt, anmoder Mykola Tomenko premierministeren
om at offentliggøre det og reagere i henhold til gældende
lovgivning.UP.
04.04.03. Europarådet
vil se nærmere på Kutjmas forfatningsændringer
Onsdag rettede Europarådets parlamentariske
forsamlings (PACE) Monitoring komite henvendelse til Den venezianske
kommission, der er et rådgivende organ ved Europarådet,
med henblik på at få en vurdering af den ukrainske præsident
Leonid Kutjmas ideer til en forfatningsændring. Dette punkt
blev først i sidste øjeblik sat på Monitoring-komiteens
dagsorden takket være Leonid Kutjmas og hele hans administrations
gamle "veninde" Hanne Severinsen, skriver Serhij Lesjtjenko i UP.
Hun mener, at Den venezianske
kommission allerede nu skal undersøge sagen, fordi hun
gerne vil have dens konklusioner inden PACEs juni-session, hvor
hun skal aflægge en rapport om Ukraine."Hvis vi skal tale
om Ukraine, så ville det være nyttigt at kende Den venezianske
kommissions mening, som vil gennemgå de forskellige ændringsforslag
til forfatningen og deres overensstemmelse med de europæiske
standarder", - påpegede Severinsen.
Serhij Holovatyj mener, at det
ikke er noget problem, at kommissionen kun vil undersøge
Kutjmas "forslag" og ikke hans lovforslag. "Det er ideer, og de er
formuleret som lovforslag. Kutjma har jo ikke skrevet: jeg formulerer
et forslag eller sender en ide. Nej, han har gjort det i form af et
lovforslag. Og det hedder "lovforslag". Proceduren blev overtrådt,
og der er ikke nogen mening i at sende ideer der er formuleret som
et lovforslag til parlamentet. Og eftersom dokumentet har formen som
et lovforslag, så kan man også behandle det som et lovforslag",
- påpegede Holovatyj. Men alt i alt er det et spørgsmål
der vedrører de interne ukrainske normer for lovgivning.
Ingen af medlemmerne af PACEs
Monitoringkomite stemte imod forslaget om at bede Den venezianske
kommission om at se på Ukraine. Det ene ukrainske medlem af
Holovatyj, mens det andet er Rakhanskyj, som indgår i Kujtmas
flertal. Sidstnævnte ville interessant nok ikke overfor UP
kommentere komiteens beslutning. "Jeg var der ikke, og jeg har endnu
ikke hørt noget om det", - sagde han. Det viser sig at være
direkte forkert. Ikke alene var han tilstede under Monitoringkomiteens
møde, men han turde ikke som den eneste at stemme imod.
Den venezianske kommissions
beslutninger er ikke bindende i Europarådets medlemslande.
Det er en ekspertinstitution, som tager sig af forfatningsmæssige
spørgsmål. Dens afgørelse er ikke alene vigtig
som en anbefaling for dem, som bliver undersøgt, men også
for selve Europarådet. PACE vil udarbejde sin holdning til Ukraine
på baggrund af Den venezianske kommissions afgørelse.
Ifølge Holovatyj, der
har været medlem af Den venezianske kommission, består
dette organ af professorer i forfatningsret ved fire europæiske
universiteter samt tidligere dommere ved højesteret og forfatningsdomstole.
Medlemmer af kommissionen er rådgivere for regeringer i Europarådets
medlemslande. Ukraine er her repræsenteret af tidligere
justitsminister Suzanna Stanik.
Kutjma har allerede en negativ
erfaring med Den venezianske kommission, som i 2000 vendte tommelfingeren
nedad for hans første forsøg på at ændre
forfatningen (ganske vist var det på det tidspunkt Holovatyj,
der var Ukraines medlem af kommissionen). Dengang erklærede
Den venezianske kommission, at Kutjmas forslag kunne skabe "alvorlige
problemer for demokratiet, rettens overhøjhed og magtbalancens
mellem magtens grene". UP.
04.04.03. "Koltjuga"-spørgsmålet
kan blive løst efter krigen
USA håber at løse spørgsmålet
om beskyldningerne mod Ukraine for at have leveret "Koltjuga"
(usynlige radarsystemer, red.) til Irak efter afslutningen af den
militære operation. "Når kampagnen er slut vil vi nok
kunne svare på det spørgsmål", sagde vice-udenrigsminister
Steven Pifer, oplyser Ukrajinski Novyny.
Diplomaten fremhævede,
at De forenede Stater og Ukraine forholder sig forskelligt til
beskyldningerne om leverancerne af "Koltjuga". Han sagde, at spørgsmålet
om leverancerne af "Koltjuga" fra Ukraine til Irak bekymrede USA meget.
På spørgsmålet
om, hvorvidt afsendelsen af den ukrainske bataljon for radioaktiv,
kemisk og bakteriologisk afgiftning til Kuwait kan være
medvirkende til at fjerne beskyldningerne for leverancerne af "Koltjuga"
til Irak, svarede Pifer negativt. "Nej, det ville jeg ikke sige",
- understregede han.
Steven Pifer sagde, at de ukrainske
myndigheder ikke fremlagde beviser for fraværet af disse
leverancer, da de amerikanske og britiske specialister i oktober
2002 gennemførte en inspektion i Ukraine p.a. "Koltjuga"erne.
Efter hans mening var der mange eksempler på, at man fra ukrainsk
side veg udenom eksperternes spørgsmål.
Diplomaten gled af på
spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt alle beskyldningerne mod
Ukraine ville blive fjernet, hvis USA ikke i finder beviserne på
leverancen af "Koltjuga" fra Ukraine i Irak. Han sagde, at dette
spørgsmål var meget hypotetisk.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Efter den undersøgelse, som eksperter fra
USA og Storbritannien efter ukrainsk forslag gennemførte
i Ukraine i oktober 2002, sagde de, at Ukraine ikke kunne fremlægge
troværdige beviser på, at landet ikke havde været
med til at sælge "Koltjuga" og sendte yderligere spørgsmål
til Ukraine.
I september meddelte De forenede
Stater, at de betragtede den optagelse som den tidligere livvagt
for præsidenten Mykola Melnitjenko havde lavet af Kutjma,
hvori denne gav sin accept af salget af "Koltjuga" til Irak som
værende autentisk og indefrøs hjælpen til Ukraine.
Korrespondent.net.
04.04.03. Jusjtjenko
vil ikke udelukke, at Kutjmas administration vil gribe til folkeafstemning
Præsident Kutjmas administration "viger ikke
tilbage for at gå efter en spaltning af det ukrainske samfund".
Det sagde lederen af "Vores Ukraine" Viktor Jusjtjenko, da han
af journalister blev spurgt om, hvorvidt det vil blive afholdt
endnu en folkeafstemning i Ukraine efter folkets initiativ om de
af præsidenten foreslåede forfatningsændringer.
Jusjtjenko mener, at man ikke
kan udelukke, at styret virkelig forbereder sig til at afholde
en folkeafstemning. Ifølge ham er målet med denne
aktion åbenlys - at ignorere Verkhovna Radas holdning og ændre
forfatningen uden parlamentets samtykke.
Eftersom "det i det nuværende
parlament ikke vil være muligt at opnå 300 stemmer
for forfatningsændringen", prøver styret gennem
en folkeafstemning at skabe et instrument, som kan manipulere
med forfatningen.
"Vores Ukraine" kender til tusinder
af eksempler på, at direktører for virksomheder
får besked på at underskrive et dokument om afholdelse
af en møde for arbejdskollektivet på virksomheden,
hvor der bliver givet en enstemmig opbakning til præsidentens
initiativer. Vi støtter ikke en sådan pseudodemokratisk
måde at drøfte forfatningsændringer på",
- citerer "Vores Ukraines" pressetjeneste Jusjtjenko. UP.
07.04.03. NATO membership
for Ukraine not likely before 2012
RFE/RL NEWSLINE Vol. 7, No. 34, Part II, 21
By Taras Kuzio
On 22 January, Ukraine and NATO jointly released
the NATO-Ukraine Plan of Action that was adopted at the NATO summit
in Prague in November. Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma had been
diplomatically advised to stay away from the summit because of U.S.
allegations two months earlier that Ukraine had supplied a Kolchuga
radar system to Iraq in 2000. A meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Committee
on the sidelines of the summit was downgraded to the level of foreign
ministers. Nevertheless, Kuchma turned up at the summit, thereby demonstrating,
according to deputy head of the presidential administration Anatoliy
Oryol, his "public success, authority, and prestige."
Although Ukraine was only offered an Action Plan
-- not participation in a Membership Action Plan (MAP) -- many
Ukrainian officials, including Defense Minister Volodymyr Shkidchenko,
have confidently predicted that Ukraine will be invited to join NATO
at its next summit in 2007. In reality, NATO membership for Ukraine
is impossible before the 2012 summit, U.S. officials told "Financial
Times Deutschland" in October. If that prognosis proves correct, in
2012 NATO will for the first time expand onto the territory of the
CIS.
The April 1999 NATO summit unveiled MAPs for nine
countries -- Albania, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia,
Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia -- and Croatia was added last year.
Of these 10 countries, all but three -- Albania, Croatia, Macedonia
-- were invited during the November NATO summit to begin accession
talks. Albania, Croatia, and Macedonia have a good possibility of being
invited at NATO's 2007 summit to begin accession talks. The enlargement
of NATO to incorporate these three states will mean that all of Central-Eastern
Europe outside the CIS -- except for Bosnia and Serbia-Montenegro --
will have joined the alliance.
What then of Ukraine's timetable for membership?
Ukraine's aspirations to join NATO and the EU have been totally
confusing, making many Western states and international organizations
reluctant to take seriously the declarations and rhetoric emanating
from Kyiv. Under both Foreign Ministers Hennadiy Udovenko and Borys
Tarasiuk (1994-2000), Ukraine's main foreign policy goal was defined
as integration into "Euro-Atlantic" structures. However until 2001,
Ukraine officially declared only its desire to join the European Union.
Last May, Kyiv stated that it will ALSO seek NATO membership. The NATO-Ukraine
Action Plan released last month mentions "the long-term goal of membership"
only once. Adopting a MAP for Ukraine between May and November 2002
would have been unlikely because the United States had already begun
analyzing portions of tapes purportedly made in Kuchma's office that
deal with the Kolchuga sales to Iraq, and the results of that analysis were
made public in September.
Kuchma's very poor reputation in the West -- he
has yet to be invited to meet with the U.S. president -- will
ensure that Ukraine will not be able to "upgrade" from its Action
Plan to a MAP as long as Kuchma remains president. It seems evident
that NATO and the West will not reinvigorate their relationships
with Ukraine until after the November 2004 presidential election there.
Consequently, Ukraine could only enter the MAP process in 2005. In
contrast, other NATO aspirant members such as the three Baltic states
began participation in MAPs in 1999.
In the cases of these countries, however, their
commitment to Euro-Atlantic integration was heartily backed by
virtually the entire domestic political spectrum. Moreover, Ukraine's
participation in a MAP in 2005 is contingent on the results of the
2004 presidential poll. Neither of the two likely pro-Kuchma candidates
-- presidential administration head Viktor Medvedchuk and Prime
Minister Viktor Yanukevych -- supports a NATO-membership bid. In
addition, Donbasite Mykola Azarov, who is deputy prime minister with
responsibility for Euro-Atlantic integration and the organizer of
the European Choice parliamentary faction, "has never been an active
Euro-integrator, defense reformer or NATO peacekeeper," "Zerkalo Nedeli"
commented earlier this month.
Given Yanukevych's Donbas origins, he is unlikely
to show much enthusiasm for the idea of converting the Russian-Ukrainian
border into a NATO-Russia one. The establishment of NATO bases
in Ukraine would also be problematic, given that Russia has a naval
base in Sevastopol until 2017. Joining NATO would create a clear
break with Russia, which would be psychologically problematic for
eastern Ukrainian oligarchs who support a "Toward Europe with Russia"
foreign policy. Russia has never expressed interest in joining NATO,
and Russian Ambassador to Ukraine Viktor Chernomyrdin claims to be unable
to comprehend why Ukraine should even need to join NATO.
Meanwhile, official Ukrainian declarations in support
of joining NATO remain at the level of mere rhetoric. Razumkov
Center President Anatoliy Hrytsenko wrote in "Zerkalo Nedeli" in
January that the Action Plan was purely declarative. Jennifer Moroney,
a Washington-based expert on NATO-Ukrainian relations, adds that
Ukraine was lucky to obtain even the Action Plan in the light of the
Kolchuga scandal and that the plan does not fundamentally alter Ukraine's
relationship to NATO. Hrytsenko agrees that there is little new in
the plan, which includes a "list of declarations" similar to those
found in the constitution, laws, decrees, government resolutions, and
existing programs. "Yet, none of the above have been duly enforced so
far." Why, then, should one expect the Action Plan to be fulfilled?
On 30 January, Kuchma issued a decree establishing
a State Council for Euro-Atlantic Integration headed by his longtime
ally Volodymyr Horbulin. The purpose of this council is not entirely
clear, as it duplicates the National Security and Defense Council
whose secretary, Yevhen Marchuk, was absent from the State Council's
first meeting. Few believe the new State Council will accelerate Ukraine's
"Euro-Atlantic" drive.
No state information campaign is under way to increase
public support for NATO membership, which is at an all time low.
A February poll by the Razumkov Center registered only 21.9 percent
in favor of membership and 37.7 percent opposed. Section 1 of the NATO-Ukraine
Action Plan is devoted to internal political, economic, and informational
issues. In all three areas, Ukraine has severely regressed since the
late 1990s, a regression that accelerated after the March 2002 parliamentary
election. Western governments and NATO are therefore no longer convinced
by mere declarations in support of democratization, such as those
made by Kuchma after the Prague summit when he committed Ukraine to
"continue market transformations, strengthen democratic principles within
the authorities and society, and ensure European standards in the sphere
of human rights."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taras Kuzio is a resident fellow at the University
of Toronto's Centre for Russian and East European Studies.
07.04.03. Verdensbanken
opfordrer Ukraine til at arbejde på WTO-medlemskab
Direktøren for Verdensbankens repræsentation
i Ukraine, Hviderusland og Moldova, Luka Barbonez, er skeptisk
overfor ideen om etableringen af en union af de fire stater Kazakhstan,
Rusland, Belarus og Ukraine, hvis landes præsidenter har erklæret,
at de vil etablere et økonomisk enhedsrum, oplyser Interfaks-Ukrajina.
Luka Barbonez siger i et interview
med ugebladet "Kievskij Telegraf", at "den eksisterende mangel
på samordning i disse landes økonomiske og sociale systemer
ikke vil medvirke til deres frugtbare samarbejde på det niveau".
"Jeg tror, at selv Belarus vil
tænke en ekstra gang over sin union med Rusland. Selvom der
i princippet ikke er noget dårligt i en union, der er rettet
mod at stimulere den regionale handel. Men i dag er det allerede evident,
at bolden ligger på Den europæiske Unions banehalvdel, og
efter Polens indtræden i Eurounionen
aktualiseres spørgsmålet om de nye europæiske
naboer", - fremhæver den regionale direktør for Verdensbanken.
Luka Barbonez mener ikke, at det
er nødvendigt for Ukraine at koordinere sine bestræbelser
på at træde ind i WTO med Rusland.
Med hans ord er Ukraine "selv i
stand til at klare det". "Disse to staters økonomiske systemer
er forskellige, og derfor er det som kan være en fordel for
Rusland, overhovedet ikke nødvendigvis vil være det for
Ukraine", - siger Verdensbankens direktør.
Han mener, at et af de alvorlige
problemer, som Belarus nu støder ind i, når man drøfter
spørgsmålet om en union med Rusland, er spørgsmålet
om de ydre tariffer.
"P.a den alvorlige ubalance i de
to landes eksportpotentiale er dette problem meget aktuelt. Hvad
angår Ukraine, så ser jeg ikke nogen mening i at koordinere
sin vej mod WTO med Rusland.
På den anden side er selve
Rusland nået længere på vej mod WTO end Ukraine.
Derfor bør den ukrainske
regering være mere aktiv og foretage større anstrengelser
i den retning, så meget desto mere, at de seneste signaler
fra Bruxelles har været positive for Ukraine", - understregede
Luka Barbonez. korrespondent.net.
07.04.03. Ukrainian sex slaves
The number-one shortage in Ukraine today is good jobs.
The item at right states that 7 million people have left Ukraine
looking for better jobs. The population of Ukraine today has dropped
below 48 million and is expected to drop much further. A recent UN report
stated the population of Ukraine could drop another 10-15 million
if the severe shortage of good jobs continues.
Ukraine needs to set as its first priority the development
and expansion of its wealth-creation capacity through implementing
the reforms needed to create a viable, strong private market economy
that will create the millions of new jobs Ukraine needs in the next
few years.
--E. Morgan Williams, Editor, Ukraine Report 2003.
KYIV, 19 March: About 100,000 Ukrainian women have
been sold as sex slaves abroad in the past few years. People's deputy
Heorhiy Buyko said at a meeting of the Ukrainian parliamentary committee
for fighting organized crime and corruption, according to a report
published by ITAR-TASS news agency in Moscow in Russian and by the
BBC Monitoring Service in English on March 19, 2003.
According to Buyko, Ukraine is Europe's third top
supplier of the "live commodity" to world markets. The past few
years have seen some 7 million Ukrainian nationals travelling abroad
to earn money, about 2 million of them being women aged under 30 stated
Buyko.
According to data from the main directorate for fighting
organized crime at the Ukrainian Interior Ministry, Ukrainian women
are in greatest demand on slave markets in Hungary, the Czech
Republic, Germany, Turkey, Italy and the USA. [Passage omitted:
world statistics on sex slavery]
07.04.03. Rice arrives
in Moscow for talks
From Jill Dougherty
CNN Moscow Bureau
Sunday, April 6, 2003 Posted: 3:08 PM EDT (1908 GMT)
MOSCOW, Russia (CNN) -- U.S. National Security Adviser
Condoleezza Rice arrived Sunday in Moscow for talks with senior
Russian officials.
The visit came amid reports that unknown forces attacked
a convoy carrying Russian diplomatic personnel and journalists
as it was leaving Baghdad, Iraq. The Russian Foreign Ministry said
five people suffered minor injuries. (Full story)
U.S. Central Command had been informed of the convoy's
departure from Baghdad and the route it planned to follow, officials
said. Central Command also said coalition forces were not operating
in the area where the attack took place.
Rice is expected to discuss Iraq with Russian officials
even as Russian President Vladimir Putin has softened Moscow's criticism
of the U.S.-led war.
"We are committed to our long-term strategic partnership
with Russia," said White House spokesman Taylor Gross. "We have
been through some difficult times, and we look forward to exchanging
views with the Russians on how best to move forward."
Relations between Washington and Moscow have been strained
over differences on Iraq policy.
Putin did not support the Bush administration's efforts
to pass a second U.N. resolution authorizing military action against
Iraq, favoring instead containment of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein
with U.N. weapons inspectors.
Russian-U.S. relations have become even more raw since
the war began, with Bush calling Putin to complain that Russian
companies were selling military equipment such as global positioning
system scramblers and night-vision goggles to Iraq.
The president called Putin on Saturday morning from
the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland before dispatching
Rice to Moscow.
Rice, whose trip had not been announced, departed Saturday
from Camp David.
Gross said that Rice's schedule had not been finalized
but that she was planning to meet with a number of senior Russian
officials.
"We have a broad relationship, and we communicate with
the Russian government through many channels," Gross said.
Bush returned to the White House from Camp David on
Sunday morning after speaking to Rice by phone and attending church.
Rice will rejoin Bush in Northern Ireland, where he
is to attend a summit Monday and Tuesday with British Prime Minister
Tony Blair.
Rice headed the Russia desk at the National Security
Council during the administration of President George H. W. Bush.
08.04.03. Folkeafstemning
hvis parlamentet ikke går med til Kutjmas reformer?
Kharkivs guvernør Jevhen Kushnarev (tidligere
stabschef for præsident Kutjma, red.) mener, at man vil kunne
finde "alternative former" til at gennemføre den politiske
reform, som Ukraines præsident har fremlagt, såfremt Verkhovna
Rada ikke vil kunne blive enig om reformen.
"Hvis der ikke bliver noget alvorligt
og velunderbygget grundlag for at drage resultatet af den landsdækkende
diskussion i tvivl, og man finder en måde på landsplan
at stadfæste resultatet af diskussionen på, har jeg svært
ved at forestille mig, at parlamentet for anden gang vil ignorere
folkets mening. I hvert fald hvad angår selve reformens nødvendighed,
for dens indhold vil der ikke være enighed om", - sagde Kushnarev
på en pressekonference i Kharkiv.
Hvis parlamentet "ikke ser sig i
stand til at tage hensyn til folkets synspunkt", understregede Kushnarev,
opstår spørgsmålet om, "hvorvidt man overhovedet
har brug for et sådant parlament, i det mindste til at opfylde
denne funktion, på et så skæbnesvangert stade i
vores stats tilværelse".
Derfor mener han, at "alternative
former" for at gennemføre en politisk reform "er mulige".
Men guvernøren understregede endnu en gang, at det netop drejede
sig om en formodning.
Han fremhævede, at han var
"en ubetinget tilhænger" af en politisk reform "p.a. dens
ideologi" - overgangen fra en præsidentielt-parlamentarisk
til en parlamentarisk- præsidentiel styreform.
Hvad angår reformens indhold,
checks and balances-mekanismen og kompetencefordeling i "magtens
trekant", understregede Kushnarev, at han havde sin egen holdning hvad
det angår.
Guvernøren lovede at fremlægge
dette synspunkt på det regionale forum, som skal opsummere
diskussionen af præsidentens initiativer i regionen en gang
i første halvdel af maj. Interfaks-Ukrajina. UP.
I går gav præsident Kutjma
guvernørerne en demonstrativ opsang, fordi de ifølge
ham havde fremlagt hans reformforslag til en "en diskussion" i offentligheden
ude i regionerne på en sådan måde, at man skulle
tro, at det allerede var bestemt, at reformen skal gå igennem
uden ændringer.
09.04.03. Anklagemyndigheden
vil rejse sager om bagvaskelse af præsidenten
Den ukrainske rigsadvokatur har rejst sigtelse for overtrædelse
af straffeloven på baggrund af artikler i massemedierne, som
sigtede mod at undergrave præsident Leonid Kutjmas autoritet,
forhindre ham i at opfylde sine tjenestlige forpligtelser og er af
krænkende og bagvaskende art, oplyser Ukrajinski Novyny med henvisning
til Kutjmas pressesekretær, Olena Hromnytska.
Det oplyses i meddelelsen, at straffesagen
er rejst med udgangspunkt i artikler i massemedier, brochurer og
andre publikationer. glav.red.info.
09.04.03. 100,000-150,000
Ukrainians working illegally in Poland
"With average monthly pay just $65 in Ukraine and more
than $500 in Poland, it is no surprise that many Ukrainians look for
work in Poland -- and that Poles gladly hire them to do menial jobs.The
migrants include many highly educated people, such as teachers who
are unable to support themselves on meager salaries in Ukraine."
Ukraine Report 2003, No. 18
By Nathaniel Espino
Lifestyle - Reuters
Saturday, Mar. 22, 2003
Ukrainian migrants find perils, profits in Poland
RAVA RUSKA, Ukraine (Reuters) - Drivers trying to cross
into Poland at this border post face a choice: Pay a $15 bribe, or
wait up to 30 hours in a queue they say is created by corrupt border
guards. Next year this will be a gateway to the European Union , and in
its last progress report the European Commission mentioned border security
as an important area of concern, urging Poland to do more to tighten controls.
Meanwhile, the estimated 100,000-150,000 Ukrainians working illegally in
Poland fear that a visa regime set to begin on July 1 will erect a "new
Iron Curtain" cutting them off from their main source of income. Ukrainians
complain of being fleeced on their side of the border and fear the visas
could lead to worse treatment at the Polish checkpoint in neighboring Hrebenne.
"There's one (Polish) shift that's terrible...they call
Ukrainians pigs, or say 'get out of here, you stink'," said Sasha,
a Ukrainian who crosses the border frequently.
Spokesmen for the Polish and Ukrainian customs services
say they are taking action against corruption.
"The problem of corruption exists, it's known to us, and
we're fighting it," said Ukrainian customs spokesman Sergey Gunko,
citing the recent sackings of officials and tighter co-operation with
the Polish customs service.
Well-read housekeepers
While figures on the number of Ukrainians in Poland are
hard to come by, illegal Ukrainian housekeepers and builders in Warsaw
are as unremarkable as their Polish counterparts in western Europe.
With average monthly pay just $65 in Ukraine and more
than $500 in Poland, it is no surprise that many Ukrainians look
for work in Poland -- and that Poles gladly hire them to do menial
jobs.
The combination of visa-free travel, short distances --
Warsaw is a five-hour drive from the border -- and the similarity
of the Polish and Ukrainian languages also makes things easier.
The migrants include many highly educated people, such
as teachers who are unable to support themselves on meager salaries
in Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet education system.
"It happens quite often that the person cleaning the house
has read more books than the owner," said Marek Skorka, a Uniate monk
who has contact with several hundred illegal workers through his parish
in Warsaw. Skorka, an ethnic Ukrainian who grew up in Poland, says
migration also exacerbates social problems in Ukraine itself.
"My parishioners have told me that there are towns where
40 percent of the women are gone -- and sometimes the husbands who
stay behind just drink up everything their wives earn."
And while the Polish media have often written about robberies
of Ukrainians at train and bus stations, police say the victims
are unwilling to file complaints as the thieves check their identity
documents and threaten their families in Ukraine.
"If you're working here you're afraid, you can't feel
good if you're here illegally -- but back there there's no future,
because there's no work," said Oksana, who has worked in Poland since
1998 as a housekeeper and nanny. Oksana hopes to save enough money
to move back to Ukraine, buy an apartment and start a family, but she's
not optimistic that will happen soon. "Of course there's always hope,
but as long as our president (Leonid Kuchma) is in power, I don't see
any chance for a change," she said.
Visa regime
While Poland will not immediately enter the EU's Schengen
passport-free travel area, the union has required it to introduce
visas for Belarus, Russia and Ukraine in preparation for membership.
Boguslaw Dubinski, in charge of the visa program for Ukraine, Russia
and Belarus at the Foreign Ministry in Warsaw, says Poland will spend
about $15 million setting up the system in 2003 and 2004.
"We as Poles have our share of experience with walls.
And we don't want to build a wall to keep out people that are historically
and culturally close to us," he said.
While visa regimes have yet to be agreed upon with Russia
and Belarus, and Russia and Lithuania continue to bicker over travel
to and from Russia's Baltic enclave of Kaliningrad, Poland's relations
with Ukraine look better. Poland has announced that visas will be
free of charge for Ukrainian citizens, and for the first time Ukraine
has chosen not to impose a retaliatory visa requirement for Poles. Poland
and Ukraine share a long but often tortured history, including bloody
battles between ethnic Polish and Ukrainian resistance groups during
and after World War II.
Already in NATO and heading for EU membership, Poland
has said repeatedly that it wants to help Ukraine in its stalled
transition from Soviet rule, though as a former imperial master,
it must tread carefully to avoid charges of paternalism.
Part of that campaign is making the visa process as painless
as possible, and in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv, Polish Consul
Krzysztof Sawicki says he plans to put the word of his political bosses
into practice. "We will do everything humanly possible to serve Ukrainian
citizens competently and respectfully," he said, citing plans to
open a new office and renovate the current building.
Sawicki, a fan of rock legend Jimi Hendrix who has brought
a stream of Polish jazz musicians to Lviv, says a group of local artists
wants to mark July's visa launch with a concert by Polish and Ukrainian
rock bands at the border.
"They want to demonstrate the idea that there's no reason
to be afraid of the visas, that it shouldn't be seen as something
that will divide our two nations," he said.
09.04.03. Ukraine
vil invitere irakiske børn på rekreation
Ukraine mener, at FN bør deltage ikke alene i overvindelsen
af følgerne af krigen i Irak; men også i etableringen
af en demokratiske orden i efterkrigstidens land, oplyser Ukrajinski
Novyny.
"At overvinde krigens følger
er den primære opgave; mens endemålet er at opbygge en
demokratisk stat i Irak. Verdenssamfundet bør hjælpe det
irakiske folk i alle faser af denne proces. Efter min mening bør
FN finde sin plads og spille sin rolle", - siger lederen af Ukraines
udenrigsministeriums pressetjeneste, Markian Lubkivskyj.
I marts opfordrede Ukraine FN til at
blive reformeret, fordi at organisationen ikke havde kunnet forhindre
en krig i Irak.
Talsmanden meddelte iøvrigt,
at Ukraine agtede at invitere de tilskadekomne irakiske børn
under krigshandlingerne med henblik på rehabilitering ved
et af Krims kursteder. Ifølge Lubkivskyj er det i dag nødvendigt
først og fremmest at tænke på de civile, som er
blevet krigens ofre.
Talsmanden for Ukraines udenrigsministerium
meddelte, at ministeriet og fonden "Ukraine til børnene" (som
ledes af præsidentens hustru, red.) samt Ukraines permanente
repræsentation ved FN og UNICEF er ved at arbejde på alle
tekniske og organisatoriske spørgsmål i denne aktion.
Tidligere har Odessas borgmesterkontor
oplyst, at man var parat til modtage irakiske børn, som er
blevet ofre for krigen, og yde dem medicinsk eller psykologisk hjælp.
Ukraine har erklæret sig selv som medlem af den
anti-irakiske koalition, som stater, der går ind for en omgående
afvæbning af Irak, har tilsluttet sig.
Ukraines præsident Leonid Kutjma
understregede, at Ukraine samtidig ikke går ind for, at man
bruger militære midler til at løse internationale konflikter
og går ind for at løse det irakiske problem ad diplomatiets
vej.
Ukraine har efter anmodning fra USA
sendt en bataljon soldater til Kuwait, som skal bekæmpe et evt.
angreb med atomare, kemiske eller bakteriologiske våben, hvilket
udelukkende er humanitær mission, som ikke vil tage del i kamphandlinger.
Den særlige bataljon er sendt for at beskytte Kuwaits civilbefolkning
mod anvendelsen af massemødelæggelsesvåben. Korrespondent.net.
09.04.03. Ukrainsk journalist
omkommet under beskydning af hotel i Bagdad
En ukrainsk journalist omkom i går i Bagdad. Det
drejer sig om kameramanden Taras Protsiuk fra nyhedsbureauet Reuters.
Det oplyser UP med henvisning til en "velunderrettet kilde". Samtidig
afviste Reuters Kyiv-afdeling ikke i går eftermiddags at give
nogen som helst kommentarer, sålænge Reuters ikke selv
var kommet med en officiel bekræftelse.
Taras Protsiuk omkom efter beskydningen
af hotel "Palæstina", hvor de udenlandske journalister holdt
til.
USA 3. infanteridivisions ledelse indrømmede
tirsdag formiddag, at en amerikansk kampvogn havde beskudt hotellet.
Ud over den omkomne Taras Protiuk blev
tre Reuters journalster kvæstet.
Taras Protsiuk var ukrainsk statsborger
født i Ivano-Frankivsk. De senere år har han været
kameramand ved Reuters Warszawa-bureau. Efter de interne regler i
Reuters sender man operatører fra flere stater ud til internationale
opgaver.
Taras Protsiuk arbejdede i starten af
1990'erne i kort tid hos CNN, hvorefter han blev ansat hos Reuters.
Han var med til at dække de væbnede konflikter i
Moskva i 1993 og i Transdniestr og Tjetjenien, hvor han fik et granatchok.
UP.
Reuters bekræftede i går oplysningen:
Reuters Journalist Killed by U.S. Tank Hit on Hotel
Tue April 8, 2003 07:33 AM ET
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A Reuters journalist was killed and
three were wounded in Baghdad on Tuesday when a U.S. tank fired a
shell at the media hotel where they were working.
A Spanish journalist was also wounded.
Television cameraman Taras Protsyuk, 35, a Ukrainian national
based in Warsaw, died after the blast at the Palestine Hotel, base
for much of the foreign media in the Iraqi capital.
Protsyuk had worked for Reuters since 1993 and had reported
from conflicts in Bosnia, Chechnya, Afghanistan and Kosovo.
Samia Nakhoul, Lebanese-born Gulf bureau chief for Reuters,
and Iraqi photographer Faleh Kheiber were both treated in hospital
for facial and head wounds and concussion.
Doctors said their injuries were not serious.
Television satellite dish coordinator Paul Pasquale, from
Britain, was taken to hospital with leg injuries but doctors said
he was not in danger.
The four were part of the 18-member Reuters team in Baghdad.
"We are devastated by the death of Taras, who had distinguished
himself with his highly professional coverage in some of the most
violent conflicts of the past decade," said Editor-in-Chief Geert Linnebank.
"Taras was one of our most experienced television journalists.
He is sorely missed by his colleagues, friends and family."
Linnebank added: "I note that the commander of the U.S.
Third Infantry in Baghdad has now said that one of its tanks fired
a round at the Palestine Hotel.
"The commander said the tank did this after it came under
fire from the hotel. Clearly the war, and all its confusion, have come
to the heart of Baghdad, but the incident nonetheless raises questions
about the judgment of the advancing U.S. troops who have known all along
that this hotel is the main base for almost all foreign journalists in
Baghdad.
"Taras's death, and the injuries sustained by the others,
were so unnecessary, " Linnebank said.
Protsyuk leaves a widow, Lidia, and an 8-year-old son,
Denis.
09.04.03. Kutjma på
besøg i Centralasien
Den 8-11. april skal Ukraines præsident Leonid Kutjma
besøge Tadzhikistan, Kyrzyzstan og Uzbekistan med henblik
på at føre forhandlinger på at etablere en frihandelszone
indenfor SNGs rammer, oplyser Ukrajinski Novyny.
Præsidentens pressetjeneste oplyser,
at Leonid Kutjma i sin egenskab af formand for SNGs råd vil drøfte
etableringen af en frihandelszone indenfor SNG med Tadzhikistans
præsident Emonali Rakhmonov, Kyryzstans præsident Askar
Akajev og Uzbekistans præsident Islam Karimov.
I løbet af sit besøg i
Tadzhikistan planlægger præsidenten at drøfte
samarbejde indenfor energisfæren, herunder Ukraines deltagelse
i ombygningen af de tadzhikiske vandværker, indenfor landbruget
(leverancerne af ukrainske landbrugmaskiner) samt metalindustrien (først
og fremmest indenfor alluminiumsindustrien).
Desuden planlægger Kutjma under
sit besøg i Tadzhikistan at udvide den aftale-juridiske base
for de bilaterale relationer, først og fremmest indenfor ordenshåndhævelsen,
finanssektoren, undervisningssektoren og sundhedssektoren
Som udløber af besøget
planlægger man at underskrive en række bilaterale regeringsaftaler:
om samarbejde i bekæmpelse af narkohandel, gensidig beskyttelse
af hemmelige informationer, samarbejde indenfor undervisningssfæren,
samarbejde indenfor sundhedssektorens udvikling, farmacien, den medicinske
teknologi og videnskaben samt uddannelse af specialister.
Man planlægger endvidere at underskrive
en aftale mellem Ukraines nationalbank og Tadzhikistans nationalbank
om gensidige clearinger samt et protokol om udvekslingen af ratifikationsdokumenter
vedrørende Aftalen af den 6. juli 2001 mellem Ukraine og Tadzhikistan
om et forenklet regelsæt for indfødsretsskifte for ukrainske
borgere bosat i Tadzhikistan og tadzhikiske borgere bosat i Ukraine.
Leonid Kutjma skal efter planen også
mødes med formanden for det tadzhikiske parlaments overhus
og underhus, Makhmadsaid Ubajdullojev og Sajdullo Khajrullojev.
Torsdag den 10. april indledes Kutjmas
et-dages besøg i Kyrgizistan, hvor præsidenten vil drøfte,
hvordan man kan aktivisere det bilaterale økonomiske samkvem,
som er blevet tilrettelagt i slutningen af marts på mødet
i den bilaterale ukrainsk-kirgiziske regeringskommission for økonomisk
samarbejde.
De to landes statsoverhoveder skal efter
planen drøfte samarbejdet indenfor maskinindustrien og landbruget,
samt den videre udvikling af relationerne indenfor rammerne af de
internationale organisationer.
Samme dag drager Leonid Kutjma afsted
på et to-dages besøg i Uzbekistan, hvor han skal mødes
med dette lands præsident, Islan Karimov, for at drøfte
hvordan man kan overvinde nedgangen i samhandlen og få gang i
samarbejdet indenfor transport,- energi- og landbrugssfæren. Korrespondent.net.
10.04.03. Kendt ukrainsk
journalist omkommer i bilulykke
Natten til onsdag omkom en af de kendteste ukrainske journalister,
præsidenten for radiostationen "Hromadske radio", Oleksandr
Kryvenko, i en bilulykke.
Tragedien fandt sted kl. 2.20 om natten
på strækningen Kyiv-Tjernihiv, 39 kilometer fra Kyiv.
Grundet endnu ukendte årsager kørte
den VW-Golf, som Kryvenko befandt sig i, ud i vejkanten og brasede
ind i et træ. hvorefter både føreren og passageren
i bilen blev dræbt.
Føreren og indehaveren af bilen
var Gizo Grdzelidze. I OSCEs kontor i Ukraine oplyste man i går,
at Grdzelidze var ansat i Georgiens udenrigsministerium. Han har i et
års tid været ansat som fungerende leder OSCEs projektkoordination
i Ukraine.
Indenrigsministeriets pressesekretær
Oleksandr Zarubytskyj oplyste, at den strækning, hvor bilulykken
fandt sted, ikke er belyst, selvom selve kørebanen er uden deffekter.
Lige nu arbejder teknikere på ulykkesstedet. Bilen var på
vej mod Kyiv.
Taras Kuzjmov, som var Oleksandrs ven
og kollega, fortalte UP, at politiets foreløbige teori
er, at føreren mistede styringen af bilen, kørte væk
fra vejen og brasede ind i et træ. "Vejrforholdene var ikke de
bedste, og han mistede kontrollen med bilen i en eller anden manøvre",
- påpegede Kuzjmov, som begav sig ud til ulykkesstedet. Ifølge
ham kender man i øjeblikket ikke den fart, som bilen havde på
ulykkestidspunktet.
Lederen af trafikpolitiet i Kyiv-regionen,
Oleksij Kalynskyj, fremsatte i et interview med "Hromadske radio" en
række teorier om Oleksandr Kryvenkos og Gizo Grdzelidzes død:
"Foreløbig kan jeg sige følgende:
Ved to-tiden om natten blev den bil med diplomatnummerplader, som
Oleksandr Kryvenko og Gizo Grdzelidze kørte i, standset af trafikpolitiets
medarbejdere for at køre for stærkt. Gizo Vakhtangovytj
Grdzelidze, som sad bag rettet, rullede vinduet ned og foreviste sine
dokumenter. Vi advarede chaufføren om, at vejen ikke var særlig
god og at man burde overholde fartgrænserne. Indtil videre kan jeg
ikke hævde, at der var alkohol i førerens organisme, fordi
det er noget retsmedicinerne vil fastlægge.
15-20 minutter senere kom der en information
fra den tankstation, som befinder sig i landsbyen Skiba i Brovary-distriktet,
om at der var sket en bilulykke. Vores medarbejdere kørte straks
derud. Den bil, som Gizo Vakhtangovytj Grdzelidze førte, havde
kørt ned i vejgrøften og ind i et træ.
Foreløbigt kan jeg sige, at vejen
var lige og tør, og at bilens nedkørsel i vejgrøften
har været meget jævn. Lige nu er der flere teorier om årsagen
til tragedien: enten mistede føreren koncentrationen eller faldt
i søvn bag rettet eller fik et ildebefindende. Jeg kan ikke
tale om andre teorier. Man bør afvente lægernes konklusioner.
Her vil man blandt andet tage blodprøver fra begge to med henblik
på at undersøge det for alkohol. Efterforskningen bør
drage den endegyldige konklusion".
Fra juni 2001 var Oleksandr (Sashko) Kryvenko præsident
for borgerorganisationen "Charter 4". Siden marts 2001 havde han været
fungerende direktør for den ukrainsk-polske journalist-klub
"Uden fordomme". Han var medlem af præsidiet i borgerkomiteen "For
sandheden" samt vice-præsident for Ukrainske forfatteres association.
Oleksandr Kryvenko blev født den
13. maj 1963 i byen Lviv og var etninsk ukrainer. I 1987 blev han
uddannet fra Lvivs Ivan-Franko Universitets filologiske fakultet og
arbejdede som lektor i ukrainsk litteratur. Kryvenko var med til at stifte
og var aktiv i selskabet "Lev" (løven, red.). Den 3. april 1989
stiftede han som redaktør avisen "Postup". Han var også
medstifter af "Memorial", "Rukh" og TUM. Var med ved "Rukh"s stiftende
kongres i efteråret 1989.
I 1990-91 arbejdede Oleksandr som korrespondent
for tidsskriftet "Ukraines mindesmærker" i Vestukraine. I 1990-94
var han deputeret ved Lvivs regionale Rada af folkedeputerede og var
formand for udvalget for ungdomsspørgsmål. Fra juli 1991
til april 1995 var Kryvenko chefredaktør for Lviv-avisen "Post-Postup".
Maj-november 1995 arbejdede han som chefredaktør
for informationsprogrammerne "Vikna" og "Vikna v svit" det internationale
mediecenter "Internews", og i 1996 blev han chefredaktør for
Tv-nyhedsbureauet "Vikna".
I 1996 var Kryvenko medlem af ekspertudvalget
under Ukraines premierminister og rådgiver for premierministeren.
I 1996-97 var han stedfortræder for lederen af Ukraines regerings
pressetjeneste. Samme periode var Kryvenko medlem af det politiske
råd i Ukraines folkedemokratiske parti (NDP).
Fra februar 1998 til juni 1999 arbejdede
Oleksandr som chefredaktør for nyhedsprogrammet på kanalen
"1+1". I marts 1999 blev han chefredaktør for tidsskriftet "Politika
i Kultura"; men forlod bladet i december 2000.
Han var i løbet af nogle måneder
af 2002 fungerende pressesekretær for sammenslutningen af oppositionelle
politikere "Forum for national frelse".
Han var medlem af sammenslutningen "Ny
litteratur", Ukrainske forfatteres association og det nationale journalistforbund.
Han var medforfatter til bogen "Vores ukrainekundskabs encyklopædi".
Oleksandr efterlader sig fire døtre
- Oksana - 17 år og de 12-årige Solomia-Vaylyna, Anastasja-Maria
og Orysia-Domna. UP.
10.04.03. Moscow reluctant
to finalize border agreements with former Soviet republics
"More than a decade has passed since the collapse of the
Soviet Union. But so far, Lithuania and Ukraine are the only former
Soviet republics to sign border treaties with Russia, and Moscow has
yet to ratify either one. Analysts say there are several explanations
for Russia's reluctance to formalize border arrangements with its post-Soviet
neighbors." Johnson's Russia List, #7120
3 April 2003
By Valentinas Mite
Prague, 2 April 2003 (RFE/RL) -- This January, Ukraine signed
a border treaty with Russia, becoming only the second former Soviet
republic to procure such an agreement. The first was Lithuania, which
signed a border treaty with Russia in 1997.
Neither treaty is ratified, and in the case of Ukraine, the
border has yet to be fully delimited. But both agreements mark the
first step in the process of finalizing the borders between the former
republics of the Soviet Union.
Oleksandr Sushko is an analyst with the Center for Peace,
Conversion, and Foreign Policy, a Kyiv-based think tank. He said he
believes the Russian-Ukrainian border will remain relatively open and
uncontrolled despite the recent treaty.
But the Baltic states are in a different position. With Lithuania,
Latvia, and Estonia all poised to join the European Union and NATO
next year, they are slated to become the eastern frontier of those
organizations and must bring their control of the borders in line with
Western standards. But Russia appears determined to challenge the Baltics'
border control. The Russian State Duma has made no moves to ratify the
Lithuanian border treaty, although Vilnius itself ratified the agreement
three years ago. Boris Makarenko is deputy director of the Center for
Political Technologies, a think tank in Moscow. He told RFE/RL that the
Russian State Duma is delaying its ratification of the treaty in order
to pressure Vilnius on the Kaliningrad issue. The Russian exclave is
due to be surrounded by EU territory once Poland and Lithuania join
the bloc next year, and the issue of transit to and from the rest of
Russia through Lithuania has proved bitterly divisive. "The border agreement
with Lithuania is signed but not ratified because the left-wing majority
in the former [Russian] parliament did not go through with it [in 1999,
when Lithuania ratified the agreement]. Now this treaty is getting mixed
up in all the Kaliningrad [transit] problems. However, I still think
Lithuania will be [the first post-Soviet country] with which Russia will
have a legitimate border treaty," Makarenko said.
Makarenko said Moscow has yet to sign border treaties with
either Latvia or Estonia. He said the Kremlin remains concerned over
the status of Russian speakers in those two states and angry that
Latvia and Estonia made territorial claims against Russia at the beginning
of their independence. "These countries had territorial claims against
Russia and abandoned them only several years ago, when the claims became
an obstacle to their membership in the EU and NATO. In this case, Russia
is punishing these countries for their foolishness during their first
years of independence," Makarenko said.
But Makarenko said that ultimately, Moscow will have no choice
but to sign the treaties with Latvia and Estonia in order to maintain
cordial relations with both the EU and NATO.
For the 12 former Soviet republics making up the Commonwealth
of Independent States, the issue of border agreements is a different
matter. Makarenko said Russia is decidedly reluctant to formalize its
borders with the former Soviet republics because of the sensitivity many
Russians feel about the issue. "To sign such treaties, even symbolically,
is a little bit too painful for Russians, who are nostalgic [for the
Soviet Union]. The public would take is as a move to build even higher
fences between brotherly peoples and a severing of ties with their compatriots
who live in these countries," Makarenko said.
Nikolai Petrov, a political analyst at the Moscow Carnegie
Center, said economic problems also stand in the way of border delimitation
and treaties. Neither Russia nor the other CIS countries have sufficient
funds to undertake a massive border enterprise, he said, adding that
the Baltics were able to press ahead only with help from the EU.
Petrov said delimitation and demarcation are particularly
important to Russia's three largest neighbors: Belarus, Ukraine, and
Kazakhstan. "Concerning Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan, they are in
a different situation [from the Baltic states]. The problem with Kazakhstan
is that there is no such thing as a [clear] border between Russia and
Kazakhstan. It is clear why [the border never existed before]. The border
with Ukraine exists and always existed as a border between regions. Now,
it is formally a border -- border posts are set on the roads between Russia
and Ukraine -- but it is not a border in the strict sense of the word,"
Petrov said. Petrov added that there are almost no roads through the steppe
that holds the Russian-Kazakh border and that large chunks of territory
have been arbitrarily claimed by Russia or Kazakhstan as their own. "Russia
needs not only political will but also a huge amount of money just to tackle
this problem in Kazakhstan alone," Petrov said.
On the other hand, Petrov said, all of Russia's post-Soviet
neighbors -- with the exception of the Baltic states -- are members
of the CIS. The current informality of the border arrangements, he said,
reflects the close economic ties that remain between the states. "The
present situation and border regime reflect the level of relations
[among the CIS countries]. I don't think that any serious moves [to formalize
Russia's border arrangements], except those dictated by temporary need,
will occur with either Belarus or Ukraine in the near future," Petrov
said.
Makarenko said that for all CIS countries, the "minuses of
border treaties for the economy are evident. And there are almost
no pluses."
10.04.03. Politiet afviser
teori om mord på journalist
Ordensmyndighederne er ved at undersøge årsagerne
til den bilulykke, som kostede præsidenten for "Hromadske radio",
Oleksandr Kryvenko og senior projektmedarbejder ved OSCE i Ukraine,
Gizo Grdzelidze, livet.
Pressesekretær ved Kyivs regionale
politi Mykola Zhukovytj oplyste overfor UNIAN, at den bil,
som de to kørte i, kørte af vejen i høj fart og
ind i et træ i vejkanten.
"Det er fastslået, at der ikke er
bremsespor på vejen", - påpegede Zhukovytj. Ifølge
ham var vejbanen tør, og efter alt at dømme var der ikke
nogen modkørende biler. Motoren røg som følge af
ulykken ind i selve kabinen, hvilket vidner om den fart, som bilen havde.
Man har endnu ikke fastslået årsagen
til bilulykken. Politiet ser på en teori om tekniske fejl i
bilen eller førerens mulige ildebefindende på ulykkestidspunktet.
Zhukovhytj påpegede, at man i dette
tilfælde efter alt at dømme ikke burde overveje at se
på sagen som et overlagt mord.
Alligevel er der rejst en sigtelse efter
straffelovens § 286 stk. 3 på baggrund af Oleksandr Kryvenkos
og Gizo Grdzelidzes død, fortalte Zhukovytj.
Det handler bl.a. om overtrædelsen
af færdselsloven eller reglerne om brug af bilen af en person,
som fører den, hvilket har ført til flere personers
død, påpegede Zhukovytj.
Ifølge ham rejser man automatisk
en sigtelse efter straffeloven, når der sker bilulykker med dødelig
udgang eller svære kvæstelser.
Ifølge Zhikovytj kan årsagen
til tragedien efter de foreløbige undersøgelser være,
enten at føreren faldt i søvn bag rettet eller, at han
fik et ildebefindende. Derom vidner blandt andet bilens "jævne"
nedkørsel i vejgrøften, eftersom at nedkørslen
havde været "brat", hvis bilen pludselig var gået i stykker.
Ifølge ham ville man foretage en
række undersøgelser herunder en retsmedicinsk.
Alle dokumenter i sagen befinder sig i
øjeblikket i Brovarys politidistrikt.
UNIAN har erfaret, at flere journalister
herunder Mykola Veresen', Taras Kuzjmov og Igor Soldatenko var taget
ud til ulykkesstedet. UP.
10.04.03. Jusjtjenko
imod at forlænge Kutjmas embedsperiode
Lederen af partiblokken "Vores Ukraine", Viktor Jusjtjenko,
går ind for at ændre det nuværende styre fremfor
at indføre forfatningsændringer med henblik på at
gennemføre en politisk reform. Det sagde Jusjtjenko under en høring
i parlamentet.
"Har vi brug for at ændre Ukraines
forfatning? Nej. Vi har brug for at ændre styret!", - sagde
Jusjtjenko. - Nu må det være slut med at holde befolkningen
for nar".
Ifølge Jusjtjenko er hovedformålet
med præsident Leonid Kutjmas forslag til forfatningsændringer
at forlænge sin embedsperiode. "Målet med præsidentens
forslag til forfatningsændringer er at forlænge sine magtbeføjelser
på ulovlig vis. Det er vi helt bestemt imod", - sagde lederen
af "Vores Ukraine".
Ifølge ham har Ukraine brug for
et styre, som kan garantere overholdelsen af forfatningens garantier
herunder garantien for borgernes rettigheder og friheder. Ifølge
Jusjtjenko har den gældende forfatningen endnu ikke udtømt
sig selv. Desuden går han ind for, at parlamentet skal vælges
ved forholdstalsvalg.
11.04.03. Ukraines
premierminister: Tyskland er interesseret i olierørledningen
"Odesa-Brody"
Ukraines premierminister, Viktor Janukovytj, siger, at Tyskland
er interesseret at transportere den kaspiske olie ad rørledningen
"Odesa-Brody" til havnen Wilhelmshafen i det nordlige Tyskland, oplyser
Ukrajinski Novyny.
"Vi har indledt konsultationer og ser store
perspektiver i forlængelsen af denne olierørledning ("Odesa-Brody")
gennem tysk territorium imod perspektivrige dybvandshavne", - meddelte
Janukovytj på en pressekonference i Hannover under sit officielle
besøg i Tyskland.
Pressesekretær i selskabet "Ukrtransnafta"
Oskana Baliun sagde til journalister, at erhvervskredse fra den tyske
olieforarbejdningssektor havde bekræftet deres interesse i transporten
af den kaspiske olie gennem rørledningen "Odesa-Brody" og videre
via Slovakiet og Tjekkiet til Tyskland til havnen Wilhelmshafen.
Baliun kunne dog ikke sige, hvilke selskaber
man konkret havde forhandlet med.
Hun fremhævede, at Ukraine så
på denne transportvej for den kaspiske olie sideløbende
med projektet om at transportere olien til Europa gennem Polens territorium
, som i øjeblikket ser på projektet til færdigbyggelsen
af afsnittet "Brody-Plock-Gdansk".
Olierørledningen "Odesa-Brody" er
674 kilometer lang og blev bygget for at kunne transportere den kaspiske
olie fra Odesa til Brody (i Lviv-regionen), hvorfra den skulle føres
videre til Europa gennem rørledningen "Druzhba".
Ukraine har nu i en årrække
ført forhandlinger om transporten af den kaspiske olie ad "Odesa-Brody"
olierørledningen samt etableringen et internationalt konsortium
til administrationen af olierørledningen og dens afslutning, så
den ender i Gdansk i Polen.
Indtil videre er det kun lykkedes "Ukrtransnafta"
at påbegynde transporten af olie fra Rusland til olieterminalen
"Juzhnyj" i nærheden af Odesa ad det 52-kilometer lange afsnit
af olierørledningen "Odesa-Brody", altså i den modsat retning
af det ønskede.
Kapaciteten af den første gren af
rørledningen "Odesa-Brody", som blev afsluttet i slutningen af
2001 udgør 9 mill. tons olie om året, og efter planen skal
rørledningens kapacitet efter afslutningen af byggeriet nå
op på 45 mill. tons olie om året. glav.red.info.
11.04.03. Løbesedler
fra pseudo-Jusjtjenko: amerikanske landmænd skal lære
"dovne ukrainere" at arbejde
Det ukrainske folkepartis (tidligere UNR, red.) organisation
i byen Nizhyn i Tjernihiv-regionen har indgivet en anmeldelse til byens
anklagemyndighed og politiet af falske løbesedler fra lederen
af "Vores Ukraine", Viktor Jusjtjenko, som dukkede op i Nizhyn i begyndelsen
af ugen. (Selvsamme løbesedler er på det seneste dukket
op i Poltava-regionen og i Kirovohrad-regionen i distrikter, hvor "Vores
Ukraine" klarede sig forholdsvis godt ved parlamentsvalget,red.).
UNPs pressetjeneste oplyser torsdag, at
løbesedlerne består af en henvendelse fra "pseudo-Jusjtjenko
til landmændene om, at nu bør man fortsætte landbrugsreformerne
og inddrage de jordstykker, som ligger klods op ad husene (dvs.: disse
jordstykker, der selv under kommunismen var landmændenes private
ejendom, skal nu udstykkes og sælges, red.)
Desuden lover pseudo-Jusjtjenko ifølge
UNPs pressetjeneste landmændene, at når han bliver præsident,
så vil han hente titusinder af amerikanere til Ukraine, som skal
lære de dovne ukrainske bønder at arbejde.
Nyzhuns afdeling af UNP kræver at
finde frem til producenterne og uddelerne af de falske løbesedler.
UP.
11.04.03. Kutjma mener,
at irakerne selv skal afgøre det irakiske folks skæbne
Ukraine ser fremtidens Irak som en stabil demokratisk stat,
som bygger på respekt for menneskerettighederne, de internationale
retsnormers og princippers overhøjhed og støtter gode
relationer til nabolandene, siger Ukraines præsident Leonid Kutjma.
I en kommentar, som blev offentliggjort torsdag
af præsidentens pressetjeneste, påpeger Kutjma, at der onsdag
i Bagdad "fandt de vigtigste begivenheder sted siden starten af den
militære kampagne". "Der er sket det, som ingen kunne være
i tvivl om: koalitionsstyrkernes sejr er allerede reelt en kendsgerning",
- understreger han.
Ifølge den ukrainske leder rejser
den nuværende situation i Irak spørgsmålet om løsningen
af akutte og påtrængende problemer. "Først og fremmest
er det nødvendigt for koalitionsstyrkerne at sikre en stabilisering
af situationen i landet og undgå en humanitær krise. Nu
er det vigtigt, at det er irakerne selv, der afgør det irakiske
folks skæbne, og at en overgangsperiode på vej mod etableringen
af en demokratisk styreform blev afsluttet så hurtigt som muligt",
- siger Kutjma.
Han påpeger, at Ukraine lige fra starten
har klart fastlagt sin holdning og grad af deltagelse i løsningen
af det irakiske problem. "Tilstedeværelsen af en ukrainsk ABC-bataljon
i Kuwait, dens indlemmelse i koalitionen i den del, som vedrører
humanitære aspekter, fratager det ikke opgaver og forpligtelser
også efter afslutningen af den militære operation", - siger
præsidenten.
"Vi vil fortsat koordinere vores handlinger
med koalitionens styrker og samarbejde på en måde, som er
passende i situationen", - tilføjer han.
Kutjma understreger, at Ukraine er parat
til at tage "mest aktivt del i genopbygningen af Iraks økonomi,
landets ødelagte infrastruktur, yde humanitær hjælp,
lægehjælp og rekreation af irakiske børn".
Han påpeger, at det er vigtigt at sikre
en styrket rolle til FN og andre internationale organisationer i løsningen
af spørgsmålet om stabiliseringen af situationen og efterkrigstidens
opbygning af Irak. Interfaks-Ukrajina. UP.
11.04.03. Indenrigsministeriet
udelukker politiske motiver i forbindelse med journalists død
1. vicestatssekretær i indenrigsministeriet Mykhajlo Kornijenko
mener, at teorien om at der skulle være politiske årsager
til præsidenten for "Hromadske Radio", Oleksandr Kryvenkos, død
er indholdsløs.
"Jeg kan entydigt hævde, at der er
tale om en ulykke", - understregede Kornijenko i løbet af en
rundbordskonference i går i Kiev.
"Der er ikke nogen politiske motiver i Kryvenkos
dødsfald, og denne teori har ingen ret til at eksistere", -
sagde Kornijenko. Han pegede desuden på, at
den diplomat, som sad bag rettet, var 64 år gammel, og
derfor "kunne være faldet i søvn, eller også kunne
han have fået et ildebefindende".
"Der var intet, der forstyrrede transportmidlets
bevægelse", - mindede Kornijenko om, og fremhævede samtidig,
at det er nødvendigt at afvente resultatet af undersøgelsen
af transportmidlet, eftersom bilen, muligvis, kan være gået
i stykker.
Kyiv-regionens trafikpolitis hovedafdeling
for efterforskning, som undersøger sagen, oplyser overfor Interfaks-Ukrajina,
at man i øjeblikket er i gang med en retsmedicinsk og kemisk undersøgelse,
som vil være færdig om ca. to uger. UP.
14.04.03. Befolkningen
deltager ikke i debatten om Kutjmas politiske reformer
92,4% af ukrainerne siger, at de ikke har deltaget i den landsdækkende
debat om de politiske reformer, som præsident Leonid Kutjma søsatte
i straten af marts, oplyser Ukrajinski Novyny.
Ifølge en meningsmåling foretaget
af det ukrainske center for økonomiske og politiske studier opkaldt
efter Oleksandr Razumkov, som blev præsenteret af centrets præsident
Anatolij Hrytsenko og direktøren for de politisk-juridiske programmer
Ihor Zhdanov, har 7,6% af befolkningen deltaget i drøftelsen.
3% af befolkningen siger, at de er blevet tvunget til at underskrive breve,
henvendelser og protokoller til støtte for reformen, 2,1% af de
adspurgte vil ikke svare, mens 94,9% ikke har sat sin underskrift under
disse dokumenter.
På baggrund af de indsamlede data konkluderer
centret, at den politiske reform ikke så meget bliver debatteret
som godkendt under tvang.
Samtidig viser undersøgelser, at flertallet
af borgerne - 61,8% - kender til Kutjmas initiativ til politiske reformer,
mens 38,2% siger, at de ikke har hørt om reformerne.
42,8% har kendskab til, at Kutjmas forslag
bliver debatteret, mens 16,7% ikke har hørt om debatten.
Undersøgelsen viser, at 34,3% af borgerne
kender til reformernes indhold, mens 22,7% siger, at de ikke ved, hvad
deres indhold går ud på.
Undersøgelsen er gennemført af
Razumkov-centrets sociologiske tjeneste i dagene fra den 2. til den 7.
april.
2013 personer over 18 år fra 121 steder
i landet deltog i undersøgelsen.
Meningsmålingens fejlmargen er på
2,3%.
14.04.03. Azarov:
USA har hævet de finansielle sanktioner mod Ukraine
De forenede Stater har hævet de sanktioner mod Ukraine,
som var blevet indført efter anbefaling af FATF. Ifølge
Interfaks-Ukrajina kom meddelelsen herom lørdag fra Ukraines
1. vice-premierminister og finansminister, Mykola Azarov, som i øjeblikket
er på besøg i Washington.
Det amerikanske finansministeriums beslutning
om at afskaffe sanktionerne vil træde i kraft, i det øjeblik
beslutningen bliver offentliggjort i den officielle avis Federal Register,
som forventes at udkomme i løbet af to uger.
Mykola Azarov, som er leder af den ukrainske
delegation ved det halvårlige møde i Verdensbanken og Den
internationale Valutafond, har holdt møder med ledelsen af det
amerikanske finansministerium om bekæmpelsen af finansielle forbrydelser
(finansiel efterretning).
Han fortalte om de fremskridt, som Ukraine
havde gjort i sikringen af bekæmpelsen af hvidvask af penge og
de praktiske skridt henimod skabelsen af et effektivt system for finansiel
overvågning og tilsyn.
Den ukrainske vice-premierminister og finansminister
berettede endvidere om, at regeringen havde sat sig som mål at
sikre Ukraines udelukkelse fra "den sorte liste" af lande, som ikke støtter
den internationale kamp mod hvidvask af penge inden udgangen af 2003.
"Desuden vil vi i den nærmeste fremtid
tilslutte os Egmont-gruppen", - sagde Mykola Azarov.
Som tidligere nævnt har Den internationale organisation
til bekæmpelse af hvidvask af kriminelle penge (FATF) anbefalet
at ophæve sanktionerne mod Ukraine, som blev indført den
19. december 2002.
Denne beslutning blev truffet på det
møde i FATF, som sluttede den 14. februar. Flertallet af FATFs
medlemslande har allerede rettet sig efter disse anbefalinger.
Ukraine forbliver på "den sorte liste"
over lande, sålænge den nye lovgivning om bekæmpelse
af hvidvask af kriminelle penge ikke er begyndt at virke i realiteten.
FATF planlægger at gennemføre en revision af "den
sorte liste" på sit næste plenarmøde den 18-20 juni.
Ukraine er på den sorte liste hos FATF,
fordi man bliver betragtet som et land, der ikke medvirker til at bekæmpe
hvidvask af sorte penge. Den 19. december 2002 anbefalede FATF medlemslandene
at indføre sanktioner mod Ukraine i forbindelse med landets mangelfulde
bekæmpelse af hvidvask af sorte, kriminelle eller lyssky penge.
Korrespondent.net.
14.04.03. "Vores Ukraine"
er imod to-kammer parlament
Fraktionen "Vores Ukraine" går imod præsident Leonid
Kutjmas forslag om at indføre et to-kammer parlament. Det sagde
"Vores Ukraine"s leder, Viktor Jusjtjenko, i sit indlæg i går
på en kongres i "Kongressen af ukrainske nationalister". "Vi er
imod et to-kammer parlament", - sagde han.
Ifølge Jusjtjenko vil overhuset - regionskammeret
- såfremt Kutjmas forslag bliver godkendt, aldrig blive valgt
af folket, men blive udpeget af præsidenten.
"Det er ikke nødvendigt at oprette et
"House of Lords", som aldrig bliver valgt, men bliver udnævnt (af
Kutjma)", - sagde han. I den forbindelse betegnede han hele Kutjmas forslag
til politiske reformer som et forsøg på at afskaffe det parlamentariske
system.
"Målet med disse midler (Kutjmas forslag)
er en gang for alle at gøre det af med parlamentarismen", - sagde
Jusjtjenko.
I begyndelsen af marts foreslog Kutjma blandt
andet at indføre et to-kammer parlament og afholde parlamentsvalg
og præsidentvalg samme år med en embedsperiode på 5
år til begge disse organer.
Præsidenten foreslog desuden Radaen at
begrænse hans ret til at udpege ministre til kun at omfatte indenrigsministeren,
udenrigsministeren, forsvarsministeren og katastrofe/Tjornobyl-ulykke
ministeren.
"Vores Ukraine", Det kommunistiske parti, Det
socialistiske parti samt Julia Tymoshenkos blok er gået imod Kutjmas
forslag til politisk reform.
Efter deres opfattelse sigter Kutjmas forslag
på at styrke hans beføjelser og er desuden et forsøg
på at forlænge hans embedsperiode til 2006. Kutjma afviser
disse beskyldninger og opfordrer befolkningen og politikerne til at
tilkendegive deres mening om den politiske reform uden skelen til evt.
personlige sympatier eller antipatier for ham. Podrobnosti.
15.04.03. Interview
med den nu afdøde journalist Oleksandr Kryvenko
OLEKSANDR KRYVENKO - PRESIDENT OF HROMADSKE/PUBLIC RADIO, KYIV -
TALKS TO ROMAN REVKNIV JAN 05 2003
Until now there has been no such project as Public Radio (PR) in
Ukraine. Unique through and through PR has undertaken a commitment to
report on what is going on and offers its studios to everyone who wants
to have his or her say; it speaks to its listeners, but does not brainwash
them; it is funded by Western donors but it is not vulnerable to any administrative
and financial pressure from the Ukrainian government or corrupt business
clans, and seeks support only from its listeners. With such a turn of events
it became the first talk radio Internet project in Ukraine.
This interview with PR president Oleksandr Kryvenko will throw more
light on the project's present and future develpments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oleksandr, let me ask you pointblank: why was it necessary to
create Public Radio in Ukraine?
Because a great number of Ukrainian radio stations are just playing
pop music alternating it with entertaining contests. There are very few
radio stations that are really mainstream and can boast their own style,
and informative ones just don't exist. There are two reasons for it:
firstly, it is much more expensive to produce talk-show radio than to
just program a computer that will churn out music round-the-clock. Incidentally,
I used to know a radio station director who claimed he could stay away
from the office for two weeks as the automated system did all the work.
The other reason is that many media managers want to avoid any conflicts
with the authorities. By merely reporting on the news or inviting someone
to the radio studios you run the risk of touching on something that will
not sit right with local government officials or their brethren in the
capital Kyiv. And you don't necessarily have to take potshots at the authorities
- it would be sufficient to cover the topics which are considered taboo
by those in power, for instance, protest actions by the opposition. If you
are reporting for the state-run radio, you will soon be reminded of who
rules the roost. If you own a radio station, officials will be quick to
warn you of the risks to which your business is exposed.
That is why an unbiased and impartial radio station cannot be created
in Ukraine for the money provided by the state or corrupt pro-regime
Ukrainian business entities. Such a radio station must also produce non-commercial
educational programs aimed to benefit its listeners. Such a radio must
be easily available so that all the parties to a political conflict can
have an equal opportunity to have their say, with listeners able to make
calls and put their questions.
Who's funding the project, and how much time has passed since
the original concept to PR's first broadcast?
Our first and main donor is the Soros Foundation that responded
favorably to a proposal by a group of influential Ukrainian journalists
and allocated $180,000. It took four months to release the funds. This
done, we began purchasing equipment, setting up our studios, creating
the Public Radio website and training our staff. We first went on the air
on May 13, 2002, broadcasting round-the-clock over the Internet.
In the About Us section of your website you mention some conflicts
that Public Radio has with the authorities. Could you be more specific
as to where you disagree with the regime?
We disagree on one major point: journalists should not help the
regime to implement its policy. We keep saying, " We don't like you officials
and we don't like like your critics. We have not been created to love or
hate you, but to keep our listeners informed." It's precisely this concept
that does not go down well with the Ukrainian officials."
Why was it so difficult to get your license? Is there a risk
that Public Radio may be closed some day?
For exactly the same reason which I have just mentioned. It made
the officials see red to know that we have received a huge $180,000 grant
funding from (according to their unshakeable convictions) the enemy of the
Ukrainian president without slipping a cent into these official's bottomless
pockets (which, in their view, is sheer impudence). I told them at once that
the grant does not provide for any bribes or kick-backs. It is next to impossible
to get a license in Ukraine without bribing the officials.
What are the feelings and emotions behind the PR team's Ukrainian
reporting? How might this be different from that of their Western colleagues?
Public Radio is staffed with young people who are patriotic Ukrainians.
They know well the standards of Western journalism and many have worked
for Western radio stations in the past. I believe, they are fully aware
of their basic commitment as journalists: to keep the public informed,
not brainwashed. It is the prerogative of the listeners to draw conclusions
based on the information they receive from us.
How large is PR's staff in Kyiv and the regions?
Our staff in Kyiv numbers 20 plus ten correspondents in Ukraine's
larger cities. In 2003 the team will grow as we are on track to significantly
increase the number of programs.
Oleksandr, what is your role in the project?
I guess, I'm like a talisman for the project. I deal with financial
donors, both current and potential, act as a broker offering our programs
and news releases to Kyiv-based and regional radio stations, as well
as help shape up the Public Radio team and train my younger colleagues
to become first-class professionals.
With several million Ukrainians listening in to your news bulletins
and talk shows, Public Radio's focus is definitely on covering political
goings-on. Is such an amount of political material a legacy of the Gorbachev
Perestroika era that triggered a tidal wave of political discussions?
There is a huge demand for political information in Ukraine, and
to have access to daily coverage of political goings-on is far more important
for Ukrainians than for the nationals of Western countries. Meanwhile,
you can hardly expect the state-run or pro-presidential media to arrange
and cover free political debates. The existence of political censorship
in Ukraine gives a greater role to Public Radio and vests PR journalists
with additional responsibility.
How can PR's editorial policy contribute to enhancing Ukraine's
image? Would it not also be good to expose your audience to past Western
experience of resolving the same social problems which are currently faced
by Ukraine?
We have embarked on a cooperation program with several partner organizations
to make the relevant Western experience available to Ukrainian listeners,
primarily, in the area of self-government. We plan to expand such cooperation.
We are well aware of the huge chunk of work facing those who, as you put
it, want to enhance Ukraine's image. This objective will take a lot of
work and sweat to reach, and it cannot be achieved by the efforts of Public
Radio alone, but we will try our best.
How consistent is your drive to ukrainianize Ukraine? How successful
are you in demonstrating to the world that Ukraine can exist separately
from Russia, and as a country of wide ethnic diversities?
I have made it clear to my staff that our contribution to ukrainianizing
the country must not be reduced to sending appeals via our transmitters
to speak only Ukrainian but to try to reach out to a wider audience. If
in a number of years our project becomes self-supporting, and we will be
able to do without Western grants, it will be the best demonstration that
we can do it on our own and exist as an independent political entity. …With
regard to ethnic versatility, Ukraine can become a good example of interethnic
peace. I can't wait to see programs on the Public Radio in Gypsy, Yiddish,
Bulgarian, Polish and other languages of the ethnic minorities living in
Ukraine.
Are you going to expand coverage of Ukrainian art and social
issues?
Yes, of course. In February we will considerably increase our broadcasting
time, raising it to nine hours daily within several months, with art and
social programs making the bulk of new programs.
Public Radio has an impressive website with Internet audio broadcasting
equipment. Given Ukraine's present conditions, how could you cope with
most of the problems which other Ukrainian websites cannot solve even now?
As the authorities denied us access to [conventional] radio broadcasting
we had no other option but to become the first Ukrainian Internet radio.
We were faced with a hard alternative: either to return the grant money
to the donor saying "Sorry, we cannot operate in such a country" or to keep
on pushing hard. We offered our political, sport, cultural and educational
programs to local radio stations - and found a lot of happy clients. Six
months later, we had twenty partner stations all over Ukraine using PR-generated
materials on a daily basis!
However, only by running a website could we put all our materials
on the air. Thanks to the Transparent Technologies team we have developed
a website where people in Ukraine and on more distant shores can read and
listen in to Public Radio bulletins and talk shows. We have applied for
financial assistance to the Embassy of the United States, and could thus
set up an impressive Internet resource that puts us in the top thirty among
some three hundred Ukrainian Internet sites. Currently, we are involved
in negotiating a deal with a United Kingdom company to purchase software
that will considerably upgrade the reliability of our Internet transmissions.
What are your strategic objectives? What future do you visualize
for Public Radio?
Any radio station must have access to radio frequencies. Since late
August 2002 we have gone on the air live with our information programs
and talk shows in the capital Kyiv on Radio Kontinent, a real thorn in
the regime's side. But this is a mere three hours of broadcasting, while
the European Union grant makes it possible for us to enlarge our broadcasting
time. Top on my 2003 list of priorities is to put the PR on a 24-hour work
schedule in Kyiv and gradually expand broadcasting in other cities.
With regard to even farther goals, our objective is to become a
national broadcaster. We know what must be done to achieve this objective,
and we are aware that we will have to put in a lot of work. In a year's
time I promise I'll be able to say something more definate.
15.04.03. Ukraine cracks down
on media
FINANCIAL TMES
By Tom Warner
April 9 2003 5:00
Ukraine's presidential administration yesterday announced a crackdown
on opposition media, signalling that journalists who criticise Leonid Kuchma,
the president, could be jailed for "hindering the fulfilment of the duties
of the president".
The statement confirms reports by a journalist rights group that
prosecutors had started interrogating journalists under a statute that
defines "interference in the activities of a state official" as a crime
punishable by up to three years in prison. Tom Warner, Kiev
Kyiv (Interfax-Ukraine) - The Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office
has opened a criminal case against a number of media outlets regarding
the publication of certain articles criticizing the president. Presidential
press secretary Olena Hromnitskaya said on Tuesday that "these insulting
and defamatory materials are aimed at creating obstacles to the president's
execution of his duties and at undermining the president's reputation."
Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Mass Media Institute said earlier that the
Prosecutor General's Office opened a criminal case against Tamara Prosyanik,
editor-in-chief of the Infomatsionny Byulleten (Information Bulletin) opposition
daily, concerning the December 5, 2002 publication of an article entitled
"One Million Dollars for the Head of Giya Gongadze."
15.04.03. Commemorating
1943 events in Volyn
"Not surprisingly therefore, the attempt by the Polish side to isolate
this event out of context and place total blame on Ukrainian nationalists
(OUN and UPA) is rejected out of hand by most shades of Ukrainian political
opinion. The 1943 tragic events in Volhynia should be commemorated. But,
the manner in which the Polish authorities are undertaking the commemoration
reflects traditional stereotypes of Ukrainians, which will serve to undo
the tremendous progress in the reconciliation of both nations since 1945."
April 10, 2003
Kyiv Post Op ed
By Taras Kuzio
www.kyivpost.com/opinion/oped/15173/
Commemorating 1943 events in Volyn
The recent friendly relations between Ukraine and Poland are nothing
new, having been developing for some years in spite of the historically
troubled relations between the two countries. However, the upcoming commemorations
of the events generally referred to as the massacres of Poles in Volhynia
in 1943 may put Ukrainian-Polish relations under considerable strain.
Polish-Ukrainian reconciliation has been promoted since 1945. The most
influential Polish emigre journal Kultura published in Paris from the late
1940's always championed reconciliation with Ukrainians. This view was
unpopular among Polish emigrés but found resonance within the Solidarity
movement in the 1980's.
By the late 1980's when Solidarity and the opposition movement emerged
from the underground to sit at a roundtable with the Communists, their
views on Ukrainians were completely at odds to those that I had grown
up with among emigré Poles in the U.K. Solidarity activists, such
as Jacek Kuron, reiterated that "Without a free Ukraine there cannot be
a free Poland!" and attended the founding congress of Rukh in 1989. With
funds from Prolog Research, publishers of the Ukrainian equivalent of Kultura--Suchasnist--
Solidarity groups printed and smuggled literature to Rukh and I helped
edit two special Polish-language issues of Suchasnist for the Polish opposition.
The fruits of this reconciliation are evident in the breakthrough in Polish-Ukrainian
relations in the 1990s. Poland is, and hopefully will remain, one of
Ukraine's main allies in its drive for Euro-Atlantic integration. The
crowning success of this reconciliation could be seen in the pope's visit
to Ukraine in June 2001. Dealing with the troubled past should not harm
this tremendous progress, which is decades ahead that of the "normalization"
of Ukrainian-Russian relations.
Placing the Volhynia massacres in context
Polish-Ukrainian reconciliation is well developed at the elite levels
only. Polish opinion polls regularly find that the public image of Ukrainians
is very low and a recent poll found that only Romanians and Gypsies have
more negative stereotypes. A Ukrainian shuttle trader to Poland recently
told Reuters that at the border Ukrainians are treated terribly. "There's
one (Polish) shift that's terrible...they call Ukrainians pigs, or say
"Get out of here, you stink." As Professor Piotr Wrobel, chair of Polish
History at the University of Toronto, confessed to me, it's fine for his
fellow Polish academics to be "anti-Ukrainian" but not "anti-Semitic." Nevertheless,
300,000 Ukrainians are working inside Poland.
Historians, writers, religious leaders and political parties have
nourished the Polish negative stereotype of Ukrainians for more than a
century. This was even the case in Communist Poland when criticism of Russians
was not permitted. However, at the same time the Communist authorities
published countless books with mass circulation, films, and even school
instructional materials that inculcated a stereotype of genocidal anti-Polish
Ukrainians. Such views were also common in Polish Diaspora newspapers. Books
and other media articles propagating these stereotypes about Ukrainians
did not suddenly cease after the Communists left office. This would have
been difficult as these stereotypes had grown deep roots in Polish society
and former Communists, such as President Alexander Kwasniewski, were in
power. Only Gazeta Wyborcza, edited by Kuron's Solidarity ally Adam Michnik,
is critical of the plans for the 1943 commemoration.
Sadly therefore, the planned commemoration of the Volhynia massacres
takes the entire subject out of context. Ukrainian-Polish relations were
poor a long time prior to 1943. Polish repression of Ukrainians and other
minorities in the 1930s led to the rise of extreme right-wing groups.
According to the Canadian expert on the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA),
Professor Emiterus Petro Potichnyj, various attempts by the Organization
of Ukrainian Nationalists and UPA to contact the Polish-government-in-exile
in London during world War II were rebuffed.
After World War II, the Poles claimed that they were the only nation
in Nazi-occupied Europe not to collaborate with the Nazis. This myth ignores
an important factor in the Volhynian conflict when Ukrainian policemen
who fled to the UPA were replaced by the Nazis with local Poles. Some Poles
also collaborated with the Soviet forces, the arch-enemy of the UPA.
Inflated numbers
A March University of Toronto talk by University of Alberta doctoral
student Krzystof Lada claimed that 390,000 Poles lived in 1,150 settlements
in Volhynia. Of the 390,000 Poles in Volhynia, Lada calculated that 33,000
died in 1943, some 8.5 percent.
To claim that this was a "planned genocide," as Lada and Polish officials
are doing, is therefore a gross exaggeration. Of the Polish inhabitants
of Volhynia, 357,000 or 91.5 percent were not physically harmed. Lada
said that 142,000 of the Poles (or around half) still lived in Volhynia
in 1944 when the Soviet army arrived.
Lada's figure of 33,000 Polish deaths is nearly half the 60,000 claimed
by the Polish government. A major problem is that the necessary research
to ascertain the correct figure is still lacking, especially in Ukraine
where even the UPA is not officially rehabilitated. Lada's figure of 33,000
should be placed alongside 15,000 Ukrainians who also died at the same time
in Volhynia.
Potichnyj, who has long edited UPA documents, concluded that "there
is no document that I know of showing that the Ukrainian underground ordered
wholesale slaughter." In areas of Western Ukraine where there was no
Polish military activity against Ukrainians, no actions by UPA against
Poles were taken.
Another aspect of the commemorations which has been ignored is the
forcible expulsion of 500,000 Ukrainians to Poland in 1944-1946. President
Kwasniewski (but not his prime minister or lower house of parliament)
has only atoned for the 1947 ethnic cleansing of 250,000 Ukrainians at
Akcja Wisla, not the far larger expulsions of Ukrainians that occurred
earlier. The murder of Ukrainians by Polish units other than the government-in-exile's
AK (such as the extreme right NSZ) and the destruction of Ukrainian Orthodox
churches in Kholm and Pidlachia has also been ignored. The involvement
of Nazi and Soviet forces in encouraging the Volhynia conflict is also
ignored. The Volhynia city of Rivne was the headquarters of Reichskommissar
Erich Koch and therefore included a large concentration of German units.
The destruction of Polish settlements and killing of Poles by the Soviets
a year later is ignored in this year¹s commemoration. The words "Gestapo"
and "NKVD" were removed from a monument erected in Wroclaw in 1997 while
"OUN-UPA" was maintained.
The Volhynia conflict was not only purely ethnic [Volhynia is an
Orthodox region]. Social problems also played a role. The forcible taking
of land by poor Ukrainian peasants drew on a long tradition of Cossack
revolts going back hundreds of years. In the inter-war period the Communist
Party of Western Ukraine (KPZU) was very active in Volhynia.
Reactions to Polish demands
The language used in the long list of Polish demands presented by
the Polish National Security Bureau (BBN) to the Ukrainian presidential
administration in February uses language reminiscent of the Soviet era
when Polish and Soviet Communist publications dealt with "Ukrainian nationalist
bands." The language is in the form of a diktat by a stronger country, perhaps
taking advantage of Kuchma's weakness at home and abroad.
Marek Siwiec, head of the BBN, insists that Ukraine recognize the
Volhynia massacres as "genocide." The monument to be erected in July in
Warsaw will claim the far-higher figure of 60,000 Poles murdered by "OUN-UPA"
as "genocide" and part of a planned "Polish holocaust."
Although the monument is not meant to be anti-Ukrainian, the result
will be to reinforce the images long cultivated in Poland of genocidal,
anti-Ukrainian Poles. The BBN also wants to take this further by exhuming
graves in Ukraine, renovating Polish military graves and researching in
archives with a view to launching future prosecutions for "war crimes."
No similar steps are to be taken against Polish members of NSZ guilty of
massacres of Ukrainians in Kholm and Pidlachia or Polish Communist and Soviet
(NKVD units who organized the 1944-1946 expulsions of Ukrainians to Poland
and Akcja Wisla's ethnic cleansing. Polish approaches to this question
suggest they believe that only Ukrainians are allegedly guilty of crimes
against humanity, but not Poles and Soviets as well.
Not surprisingly therefore, the attempt by the Polish side to isolate
this event out of context and place total blame on Ukrainian nationalists
(OUN and UPA) is rejected out of hand by most shades of Ukrainian political
opinion.
The 1943 tragic events in Volhynia should be commemorated. But, the
manner in which the Polish authorities are undertaking the commemoration
reflects traditional stereotypes of Ukrainians, which will serve to undo
the tremendous progress in the reconciliation of both nations since 1945.
15.04.03. Ukraine
arbejder på at blive medlem af WTO før Rusland
Kommentar: Ukraine har udnyttet den seneste tids forværring
af forholdet mellem USA og Rusland til at intensivere bestræbelserne
henimod et medlemskab af frihandelsorganisationen WTO og bevæge sig
væk fra aftalen om det økonomiske enhedsrum, som Kutjma var
med til at underskrive den 23. februar. Hermed ser Rusland ud til at have
udtømt sit arsenal af integrationspolitiske bestræbelser i
forhold til Ukraine og vil formentlig være henvist til at gå
over til en eller anden form for mere kontant omend skjult pression, fordi
enhver åben konfrontation med Ukraines regering vil være ensbetydende
med en falliterklæring for Putins Ukraine-politik. Økonomiminster
Valerij Khoroshkovskyj, der hidtil har talt for en "synkron" bevægelse
henimod et WTO-medlemskab med Rusland, kom i sidste uge med en erklæring
om, at WTO-medlemskabet nu var blevet en absolut topprioritet for Ukraine,
og at der ikke kunne blive tale om en koordination af denne bestræbelse
med andre lande, hvis det var i strid med Ukraines nationale interesser.
WTO er også blevet mere tillokkende for Ukraine, efter at den handlingsplan
for Ukraine, som NATO har udstukket, har sat et medlemskab af frihandelsorganisationen
som en af forudsætningerne for en tilnærmelse til den nordatlantiske
alliance. Ukraine er også blevet opmuntret af USAs ambassadør
i Ukraine, som har udtalt, at USA gerne vil hjælpe Ukraine med at
blive medlemmer af frihandelsorganisationen. WTO ser ud til at blive Ukraines
økonomiske pendant til EU og NATO som et alternativ til de russiske
integrationsbestræbelser indenfor rammerne af SNG.
Den 16. april afholdes i Moskva det tredje møde på højt
niveau i den arbejdsgruppe, som skal drøfte problemet omkring oprettelsen
af et økonomisk enhedsrum mellem de fire lande: Ukraine, Kazakhstan,
Hviderusland og Rusland. Ifølge den russiske vice-premierminister
Viktor Hristenko vil man netop efter dette møde kunne tale om indledningen
af reelle forhandlinger om oprettelsen af denne internationale økonomiske
organisation. Ifølge ham har alle de forudgående møder
og samtaler ikke været andet end diskussioner. Den hårdeste
meningsudveksling vil efter alt at dømme dreje sig om koordineringen
af de fire landes respektive bestræbelser på at blive medlemmer
af WTO.
Den 23. februar underskrev de fire landes præsidenter
en aftale om oprettelsen af et økonomisk enhedsrum med deltagelse
af Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Hviderusland og Rusland. Samtidig pålagde
præsidenterne deres regeringer inden efteråret at udarbejde
en aftaletekst. Ideen var, at den nye organisation ikke alene skulle blive
et internationalt organ; men en overnational organisation, som har reelle
magtbeføjelser. Dens hovedkvarter skulle ligge i Kiev, mens en kazakhisk
statsborger skulle stå i spidsen for den. Denne konstruktion skulle
udelukke enhver mistanke om, at Rusland ønskede igen at blive "storebror"
indenfor SNG. Men nu ser det endnu engang ud til, at det hele at ved at gå
i hårdknude.
Ifølge Viktor Hrystenko vil man inden den
16. april have udarbejdet et koncept for det økonomiske enhedsrum,
som man så skal forhandle om. Vice-premierministeren indrømmede,
at der var en hel del diskussion omkring dokumentet. Først og fremmest
drejer det sig om en klar definition af begrebet Økonomisk enhedsrum.
Rusland insisterer på, at der hermed menes en fri bevægelse
af ikke alene kapital men også varer og arbejdskraft. Visse forhandlingspartnere
foreslår imidlertid, at man ikke åbner markederne parallelt,
men efterhånden, skridt for skridt. Viktor Hristenko mener imidlertid,
at de konsekvente bevægelser i denne retning allerede gang på
gang har undladt at føre til mærkbare resultater, hvorfor problemerne
omkring tarifreguleringen, koordinationen af penge- og kreditpolitikken
o.s.v. skal løses parallelt.
Hovedproblemet for den økonomiske integration
ligger imidlertid ikke i SNG, men udenfor SNG; nemlig i verdens frihandelsorganisation
- WTO. Tirsdag i sidste uge indrømmede Viktor Hristenko overfor
Strana.ru, at parterne indtil videre ikke har formået at blive
enige om en synkron tilslutning til WTO, for slet ikke at tale om ens vilkår
for et medlemskab af organisationen. "Hvis det ikke lykkes, vil hele ideen
med Det økonomiske enhedsrum ikke blive til noget, - mener en af
lederne af den russiske regering , - vi bør forstå, at hvem
denne banket så vil betale for".
Det drejer sig om et temmelig kompliceret problem.
Ifølge Strana.ru har Ukraine under sine forhandlinger om
en tilslutning til WTO allerede underskrevet bilaterale aftaler med en
række lande. Desuden indrømmede et af medlemmerne af den ukrainske
deletagion overfor Strana.ru, at en sådan protokol var blevet
underskrevet med Den europæiske Union. Men fra ukrainsk side er man
ikke meget for at offentliggøre de underskrevne dokumenter. Efter
alt at dømme har Moskva i hvert fald ikke nogen klare informationer
endnu. Præsidenterne for de fire lande har indtil videre pålagt
eksperterne at studere forbindelsen mellem en tilslutning til WTO og udformningen
af det økonomiske enhedsrum rapportere om forslag til en synkronisering
af forhandlingerne. I mellemtiden er der opstået rygter om, at Ukraine
i sin aftale med EU ikke alene er gået med til en minimal importafgift
på enkelte varetyper; men også har tilsluttet sig aftalen "Om
handel med civil luftfartsteknologi", som ikke er obligatorisk for WTO.
Hvis det er tilfældet, så er Rusland tvunget til at vælge
imellem, om man enten skal etablere et økonomisk enhedsrum og miste
hele sin flyindustri eller opføre toldbarrierer på grænsen
til Ukraine.
Desuden har Ukraines premierminister Viktor Janukovytj
fornylg sagt, at man i den nærmeste fremtid vil underskrive en tilsvarende
aftale med USA. Rusland ved også meget lidt om de vilkår,
som dette dokument består af.
Den sparsomme information fra Kiev om de aftaler
man underskriver og som har en indflydelse på de fælles planer
for etableringen af Det økonomiske enhedsrum, ser mistænkelig
ud. Viktor Hristenko bemærkede, at denne diskussion havde varet
halvanden indenfor rammerne af Den euroasiatiske økonomiske Union.
Og kun efter hårde forhandlinger var det lykkedes medlemslandenes
ledere at underskrive et dokument, som fastlagde de fælles principper
for forhandlingerne med WTO. Men i modsætning til Hviderusland og
Kazakhstan er Ukraine ikke medlem af Den euroasiatiske økonomiske
Union. Derfor ser de kommende forhandlinger i Moskva ud til at blive afgørende.
Enten vil alle medlemmerne af processen blive enige om at spille med åbne
kort, eller også vil processen trække i langdrag. Ukraine.ru.
Copyright (c) Dansk-Ukrainsk Selskab og Ivan Nester